Tidal. Slightly cheaper, hugely better sound quality, artists are paid better, no investments into military AI.

Which restrictions do you have in mind?

I don't think it is fair to characterize this as a "both sides' situation. I tried *for months* to engage in open dialogue

They lacked the common-decency to reply to the emails asking for the paper, after I answered emails from them for years

If they write a reply, happy to have a follow-up post

2) Clintin & Richard say we claim to test if p-curve is skewed but we don't do that

I see this as semantics.

Indeed. We don't test whether *observed* p-values are skewed.
Rather. We test whether data generator produces skewed ps

e.g. p=.0001, p=.0002 are not skewed but suggest skewed generator

They say, I think 2 things that fall in this category.

1 ) Clintin & Richard say "evidential value" is not a stats concept.

I agree, but this is because we invented it. We needed a term for "significant after accounting for p-hacking", It didn't exist, so we came up with evidential value.

A feature i really like is custom intro and "outro" skipping so you skip the yada yada and get to the actual episode

Podcast addict

Victorian Internet by Sandage

History of the Telegraph

yeah, i never got in portrait mode. but i can see the upside of 2 screens if you like that

With their approach this seems easy actually. What we call 'treated stimulus design'. Draw one man, black or white, algorithmically generate the twin of the other race. And There is still room for stratified sampling

Interesting that 10% of people don't answer leading poll questions.

It's what we choose to focus on actually.

I dont think thats a realistic concern if you just browse the home page. It's a funny headline, but not super diagnostic

This is the kind of reporting i had in mind as necessary.
It does not look good
edition.cnn.com/2025/06/04/m...