We, or rather our creations—LLMs—should strive to be good, mature poets, rather than condemning ourselves as bad poets from the outset.

But I wonder how many users truly realize that this was once pioneered by the same Jack Patrick Dorsey as 𝕏, and that, just like 𝕏, it was abandoned by him—and that his stance is that all intellectual property rights should be deleted.

It's the same vibe as YouTube's auto-captions or translated audio. The real issue is how users see it; we just need better media literacy, for real. Isn't it kind of capped that users who were totally fine using manga panels, show clips, and Tenor GIFs are now suddenly up in arms about it?

I suppose I shouldn't wish for anything, should I?

I am suffering from depression and had no choice but to drop out of my studies. Even though I'm supposedly convalescing, all I do is take medication, and I'm not getting any better at all. I can't even get a job.

Sociology appears to be a curious discipline. I hope that someday I might engage in meaningful intellectual exchange with knowledgeable experts in the field.

To me, this appears not as "hypothesis" or "research," but rather as literary rhetoric—specifically, "how to craft one's unsupported claims to appear legitimate."

"prepare a proposition whose truth value has been arbitrarily predetermined" and then "later devise a research perspective that allows for interpreting data collected in a manner that does not contradict the truth of that proposition."

However, the research method presented by the Japanese sociologist I mentioned earlier can be interpreted as recommending that one:

and that "research" means "verifying the truth or falsity of that proposition—regardless of whether the result differs from one's initial expectations."

This approach seems to conflate 'hypotheses' with 'propositions that can be evaluated as true or false'—particularly propositions whose truth value has been predetermined.

What interpretations regarding this methodological approach are considered mainstream within the field?

1. predetermining desired conclusions,
2. reverse-engineering hypotheses to support those conclusions,
3. iteratively modifying hypotheses until all contradictory evidence is eliminated.