Focusing on Evolution, Ecology and Environmental dimensions of AMR & plasmids
Formerly @ DTU & UoExeter
He/him
The study provides one of the most comprehensive comparisons between acquired ARGs and latent ones identified through functional metagenomics.
The study provides one of the most comprehensive comparisons between acquired ARGs and latent ones identified through functional metagenomics.
3/3
3/3
2/3
2/3
Check the full study led by Jin Huang (Central South University) & Bing Li (Tsinghua Uni Shenzhen Graduate School) here:
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Check the full study led by Jin Huang (Central South University) & Bing Li (Tsinghua Uni Shenzhen Graduate School) here:
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Regulations based solely on chemical residues overlook microbial risks. Withdrawal times must also consider ARG abundance, mobility, and pathogen enrichment to protect food safety & the environment.
7/8
Regulations based solely on chemical residues overlook microbial risks. Withdrawal times must also consider ARG abundance, mobility, and pathogen enrichment to protect food safety & the environment.
7/8
6/8
6/8
5/8
5/8
4/8
4/8
3/8
3/8
2/8
2/8
3/3
3/3
2/3
2/3
🔗 github.com/enviresist/P...
Interactive lookup: enviresist.github.io/PNEC_res
This could help set antibiotic discharge limits that truly protect against AMR selection in the environment. 🧬💊
🌍🛡
9/9
🔗 github.com/enviresist/P...
Interactive lookup: enviresist.github.io/PNEC_res
This could help set antibiotic discharge limits that truly protect against AMR selection in the environment. 🧬💊
🌍🛡
9/9
Our framework is:
💊grounded in ecology & evolution
💊transparent & easy to compute
💊adjustable to different risk tolerances
💊ready for use in environmental AMR regulation
💊easily updateable when new cost or MIC data emerges
8/9
Our framework is:
💊grounded in ecology & evolution
💊transparent & easy to compute
💊adjustable to different risk tolerances
💊ready for use in environmental AMR regulation
💊easily updateable when new cost or MIC data emerges
8/9
Example: To protect against selection for 95% of resistances, you’d use ~1/250 of MIClowest (25x lower than before).
7/9
Example: To protect against selection for 95% of resistances, you’d use ~1/250 of MIClowest (25x lower than before).
7/9
6/9
6/9
26 strain–antibiotic pairs
13 antibiotics, 3 model bacteria, plasmid & chromosomal resistance
➡ 66% of predicted MSCs were within a factor of 2 of experimental values!
5/9
26 strain–antibiotic pairs
13 antibiotics, 3 model bacteria, plasmid & chromosomal resistance
➡ 66% of predicted MSCs were within a factor of 2 of experimental values!
5/9