Do you know how I could get access to the other documents related to this case, including the expert reports cited in the ruling and order?

Not much: open.substack.com/pub/grimoire...

This is not what I expect from the MAA. I agree it sounds like article was written by an LLM

The reason I prefer this is that it’s feels more natural, not a random collection of rules. Symmetry, ability to undo a move, ability to compose moves, are all very natural things to want to have/study. But the set-with-operation def seems hard to justify vs semi group or monoid—it feels arbitrary

I’ve long felt that the set-with-binary-operation definition is the wrong way to define a group. I much prefer to say it is a nonempty set of symmetries (bijective functions of some set to itself) that is closed under compositions and inverses. Associativity and the identity come for free.

This is confirming, yet again, my experience that SIAM conferences are much better run than AMS. #mathsky #JMM2025

And the conf app doesn’t work without wifi, so I’m wishing for the paper program like we’re back in the last century

This is crazy. It's morally wrong, socially irresponsible, technically stupid, financially dangerous (does that tiny disclaimer saying "don't trust this!" in a tiny font going to hold up in court?). What is up at Google, have they truly given the reins of the company to an unfathomable idiot?

This is confirming, yet again, my experience that SIAM conferences are much better run than AMS. #mathsky #JMM2025

And the conf app doesn’t work without wifi, so I’m wishing for the paper program like we’re back in the last century

This was a really nice talk about some very interesting ideas

Sorry, sounds like I need to work on my humor detector

Hard disagree. It looks better than any other system out there, by orders of magnitude. Making math easily readable takes work, just like explaining math clearly takes work. Plus it's easy to make a macro--please just don't inflict MSWord upon us.