@tryg72.bsky.social
Emotional. Don't forget emotional.
Having emotions outside of a holiday or sports complex is just virtue signalling, right?
Having emotions outside of a holiday or sports complex is just virtue signalling, right?
December 21, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Emotional. Don't forget emotional.
Having emotions outside of a holiday or sports complex is just virtue signalling, right?
Having emotions outside of a holiday or sports complex is just virtue signalling, right?
? Trump did that lots.
He had them caged like animals at a side show, while Trump was the circus ring master.
Maybe Dems will call a reporter piggy?
He had them caged like animals at a side show, while Trump was the circus ring master.
Maybe Dems will call a reporter piggy?
December 20, 2025 at 12:56 AM
? Trump did that lots.
He had them caged like animals at a side show, while Trump was the circus ring master.
Maybe Dems will call a reporter piggy?
He had them caged like animals at a side show, while Trump was the circus ring master.
Maybe Dems will call a reporter piggy?
It's a shit argument that we already do things to impose liability that we don't do for guns?
He gives examples right there.
Have all the opinions you want, but saying that it's a shit argument to describe reality is kinda unconvincing.
He gives examples right there.
Have all the opinions you want, but saying that it's a shit argument to describe reality is kinda unconvincing.
December 19, 2025 at 8:32 PM
It's a shit argument that we already do things to impose liability that we don't do for guns?
He gives examples right there.
Have all the opinions you want, but saying that it's a shit argument to describe reality is kinda unconvincing.
He gives examples right there.
Have all the opinions you want, but saying that it's a shit argument to describe reality is kinda unconvincing.
Easily 99% likely.
Even if they try to undo stuff, they'll do it the collaborative way and it'll take decades (meaning it won't happen).
There's (evil) genius in just plowing ahead. It unfortunately works if you're in the right position.
Even if they try to undo stuff, they'll do it the collaborative way and it'll take decades (meaning it won't happen).
There's (evil) genius in just plowing ahead. It unfortunately works if you're in the right position.
December 19, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Easily 99% likely.
Even if they try to undo stuff, they'll do it the collaborative way and it'll take decades (meaning it won't happen).
There's (evil) genius in just plowing ahead. It unfortunately works if you're in the right position.
Even if they try to undo stuff, they'll do it the collaborative way and it'll take decades (meaning it won't happen).
There's (evil) genius in just plowing ahead. It unfortunately works if you're in the right position.
As a white dude, let me just add my voice that I've had my share of unfair things happen in my life.
And absolutely none of them were because I'm a white dude.
The author has got to be thinking that unfair things shouldn't happen to white dudes, which is so fragile-precious it's disgusting.
And absolutely none of them were because I'm a white dude.
The author has got to be thinking that unfair things shouldn't happen to white dudes, which is so fragile-precious it's disgusting.
December 18, 2025 at 2:10 AM
As a white dude, let me just add my voice that I've had my share of unfair things happen in my life.
And absolutely none of them were because I'm a white dude.
The author has got to be thinking that unfair things shouldn't happen to white dudes, which is so fragile-precious it's disgusting.
And absolutely none of them were because I'm a white dude.
The author has got to be thinking that unfair things shouldn't happen to white dudes, which is so fragile-precious it's disgusting.
No.
You really don't have to work with Nazis.
This is "hey Republicans, come spend time hanging out with the salve owning Democrats ... we'll convince them that people with dark skin are people just like us white folk!" And it'll have the same impact.
You really don't have to work with Nazis.
This is "hey Republicans, come spend time hanging out with the salve owning Democrats ... we'll convince them that people with dark skin are people just like us white folk!" And it'll have the same impact.
December 18, 2025 at 12:14 AM
No.
You really don't have to work with Nazis.
This is "hey Republicans, come spend time hanging out with the salve owning Democrats ... we'll convince them that people with dark skin are people just like us white folk!" And it'll have the same impact.
You really don't have to work with Nazis.
This is "hey Republicans, come spend time hanging out with the salve owning Democrats ... we'll convince them that people with dark skin are people just like us white folk!" And it'll have the same impact.
Yeah, I was waiting for her to rip him a new one. She never got past loading up.
It's not ripping someone a new one when they calmly agree with what you're saying.
It's not ripping someone a new one when they calmly agree with what you're saying.
December 17, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Yeah, I was waiting for her to rip him a new one. She never got past loading up.
It's not ripping someone a new one when they calmly agree with what you're saying.
It's not ripping someone a new one when they calmly agree with what you're saying.
Satire is therapy.
a cartoon of homer simpson and bart simpson with the words that you know of so far
ALT: a cartoon of homer simpson and bart simpson with the words that you know of so far
media.tenor.com
December 17, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Satire is therapy.
No, that's it. The blockade is it.
Functionally demanding the return of things that haven't been stolen, that's thiiiiiiiis close to an act of war. It's announcing intent to war it up based on a pretense.
Functionally demanding the return of things that haven't been stolen, that's thiiiiiiiis close to an act of war. It's announcing intent to war it up based on a pretense.
December 17, 2025 at 1:42 AM
No, that's it. The blockade is it.
Functionally demanding the return of things that haven't been stolen, that's thiiiiiiiis close to an act of war. It's announcing intent to war it up based on a pretense.
Functionally demanding the return of things that haven't been stolen, that's thiiiiiiiis close to an act of war. It's announcing intent to war it up based on a pretense.
To be clear, I didn't feel targeted.
I felt like people with power were punching, lacked actual targets, and so we're left with punching down in general.
I felt like people with power were punching, lacked actual targets, and so we're left with punching down in general.
December 15, 2025 at 10:02 PM
To be clear, I didn't feel targeted.
I felt like people with power were punching, lacked actual targets, and so we're left with punching down in general.
I felt like people with power were punching, lacked actual targets, and so we're left with punching down in general.
There's a lot of being told what to do today.
Apparently I need to do so many things because my impact on the world is lesser than someone else. This is another on that pile.
I didn't think your note was worth shooting back at, but yeah it did feel like a shot across the bow.
Apparently I need to do so many things because my impact on the world is lesser than someone else. This is another on that pile.
I didn't think your note was worth shooting back at, but yeah it did feel like a shot across the bow.
December 15, 2025 at 10:01 PM
There's a lot of being told what to do today.
Apparently I need to do so many things because my impact on the world is lesser than someone else. This is another on that pile.
I didn't think your note was worth shooting back at, but yeah it did feel like a shot across the bow.
Apparently I need to do so many things because my impact on the world is lesser than someone else. This is another on that pile.
I didn't think your note was worth shooting back at, but yeah it did feel like a shot across the bow.
Sounds like a major question that needs attention.
It really is that Democrats are legally at a higher standard of scrutiny. We've legalized the in-group protected without being bound vs the out-group being bound without protections.
It really is that Democrats are legally at a higher standard of scrutiny. We've legalized the in-group protected without being bound vs the out-group being bound without protections.
December 15, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Sounds like a major question that needs attention.
It really is that Democrats are legally at a higher standard of scrutiny. We've legalized the in-group protected without being bound vs the out-group being bound without protections.
It really is that Democrats are legally at a higher standard of scrutiny. We've legalized the in-group protected without being bound vs the out-group being bound without protections.
Definitely worth giving that site your vote that it's relevant and important!
Let's keep pumping views to the Nazi site because occasionally they'll openly state what everyone can already see with their own eyes!!
Let's keep pumping views to the Nazi site because occasionally they'll openly state what everyone can already see with their own eyes!!
December 13, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Definitely worth giving that site your vote that it's relevant and important!
Let's keep pumping views to the Nazi site because occasionally they'll openly state what everyone can already see with their own eyes!!
Let's keep pumping views to the Nazi site because occasionally they'll openly state what everyone can already see with their own eyes!!
And there's zero need to say that zero tolerance for private law breaking would enable better crackdowns on misuse of office law breaking.
Well, we let Clinton arguably purjure and create an impermissible office atmosphere, therefore Trump can sell off classified info, sell pardons, tarrif & spend
Well, we let Clinton arguably purjure and create an impermissible office atmosphere, therefore Trump can sell off classified info, sell pardons, tarrif & spend
December 13, 2025 at 8:11 PM
And there's zero need to say that zero tolerance for private law breaking would enable better crackdowns on misuse of office law breaking.
Well, we let Clinton arguably purjure and create an impermissible office atmosphere, therefore Trump can sell off classified info, sell pardons, tarrif & spend
Well, we let Clinton arguably purjure and create an impermissible office atmosphere, therefore Trump can sell off classified info, sell pardons, tarrif & spend
Yes, let's definitely re-litigate whether it was good faith application of the law that Kenneth Star finally found *something*.
If we only had impeached Clinton then ... NO! There's just as good of a likelihood that the search would have turned to what other Dems could be found.
If we only had impeached Clinton then ... NO! There's just as good of a likelihood that the search would have turned to what other Dems could be found.
December 13, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Yes, let's definitely re-litigate whether it was good faith application of the law that Kenneth Star finally found *something*.
If we only had impeached Clinton then ... NO! There's just as good of a likelihood that the search would have turned to what other Dems could be found.
If we only had impeached Clinton then ... NO! There's just as good of a likelihood that the search would have turned to what other Dems could be found.
Just because others are sharing stuff doesn't mean you need to.
What do you want people to learn from this? Is it fun? Educational?
Or is this a wreck that you're enabling people to gawk at?
What do you want people to learn from this? Is it fun? Educational?
Or is this a wreck that you're enabling people to gawk at?
December 12, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Just because others are sharing stuff doesn't mean you need to.
What do you want people to learn from this? Is it fun? Educational?
Or is this a wreck that you're enabling people to gawk at?
What do you want people to learn from this? Is it fun? Educational?
Or is this a wreck that you're enabling people to gawk at?
You gave away your entire point when you say that Harris' messaging got through better than Trump's, but she lost because of economic fears.
Use your thinking capabilities. How did people generally come to a similar opinion on the economy?
Use your thinking capabilities. How did people generally come to a similar opinion on the economy?
December 11, 2025 at 10:23 PM
You gave away your entire point when you say that Harris' messaging got through better than Trump's, but she lost because of economic fears.
Use your thinking capabilities. How did people generally come to a similar opinion on the economy?
Use your thinking capabilities. How did people generally come to a similar opinion on the economy?
See the size of that dog?
Everyone except people who own those dogs knows that they strongly tend to do that.
We all know you thought you had the exception and are surprised. No one else is surprised.
Everyone except people who own those dogs knows that they strongly tend to do that.
We all know you thought you had the exception and are surprised. No one else is surprised.
December 11, 2025 at 1:26 AM
See the size of that dog?
Everyone except people who own those dogs knows that they strongly tend to do that.
We all know you thought you had the exception and are surprised. No one else is surprised.
Everyone except people who own those dogs knows that they strongly tend to do that.
We all know you thought you had the exception and are surprised. No one else is surprised.
Kids have it hard *nowadays* because of things that have *existed for decades*?
I don't want to be the guy saying "it's unfair to fix problems today because I had to have them years ago" so, are we really sure that the typical college experience is really so onerous that the work is problematic?
I don't want to be the guy saying "it's unfair to fix problems today because I had to have them years ago" so, are we really sure that the typical college experience is really so onerous that the work is problematic?
December 10, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Kids have it hard *nowadays* because of things that have *existed for decades*?
I don't want to be the guy saying "it's unfair to fix problems today because I had to have them years ago" so, are we really sure that the typical college experience is really so onerous that the work is problematic?
I don't want to be the guy saying "it's unfair to fix problems today because I had to have them years ago" so, are we really sure that the typical college experience is really so onerous that the work is problematic?
If they were safely in the playoff field (meaning there's significance to being in the week 8 or week 10 playoff rankings) **then they already have their value**!
Or, if those are worthless snapshots, then relying on worthless snapshots is idiotic.
ND chose not to play. They don't deserve more.
Or, if those are worthless snapshots, then relying on worthless snapshots is idiotic.
ND chose not to play. They don't deserve more.
December 9, 2025 at 6:34 PM
If they were safely in the playoff field (meaning there's significance to being in the week 8 or week 10 playoff rankings) **then they already have their value**!
Or, if those are worthless snapshots, then relying on worthless snapshots is idiotic.
ND chose not to play. They don't deserve more.
Or, if those are worthless snapshots, then relying on worthless snapshots is idiotic.
ND chose not to play. They don't deserve more.
Were you the adult with the unhealthy steroid and gym obsession or the child looking for guidance from adults who are already lost in their layers of obsession?
December 9, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Were you the adult with the unhealthy steroid and gym obsession or the child looking for guidance from adults who are already lost in their layers of obsession?
What?
No likely contenders were excluded.
This idea that the playoff has to get sports spots at the bottom right is misguided. No one is being cheated by having to go to a big bowl game instead of a playoff - those teams weren't going to win it all.
No likely contenders were excluded.
This idea that the playoff has to get sports spots at the bottom right is misguided. No one is being cheated by having to go to a big bowl game instead of a playoff - those teams weren't going to win it all.
December 8, 2025 at 7:10 PM
What?
No likely contenders were excluded.
This idea that the playoff has to get sports spots at the bottom right is misguided. No one is being cheated by having to go to a big bowl game instead of a playoff - those teams weren't going to win it all.
No likely contenders were excluded.
This idea that the playoff has to get sports spots at the bottom right is misguided. No one is being cheated by having to go to a big bowl game instead of a playoff - those teams weren't going to win it all.
Trial for what?
ICE and CBP get qualified immunity. You'd have to be very strategic AND there'd need to be a published federal court appeal *from that district* on the EXACT factual circumstances.
We can hope for changes to the law, I don't think hoping these thugs face consequences is realistic
ICE and CBP get qualified immunity. You'd have to be very strategic AND there'd need to be a published federal court appeal *from that district* on the EXACT factual circumstances.
We can hope for changes to the law, I don't think hoping these thugs face consequences is realistic
December 5, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Trial for what?
ICE and CBP get qualified immunity. You'd have to be very strategic AND there'd need to be a published federal court appeal *from that district* on the EXACT factual circumstances.
We can hope for changes to the law, I don't think hoping these thugs face consequences is realistic
ICE and CBP get qualified immunity. You'd have to be very strategic AND there'd need to be a published federal court appeal *from that district* on the EXACT factual circumstances.
We can hope for changes to the law, I don't think hoping these thugs face consequences is realistic
I really want to believe that democracy means all adults should vote to shape our world ... but it's hard to justify that wish sometimes.
Having landed gentry being the only deciders is a bad idea, and at the same time you kinda understand the impulse.
Having landed gentry being the only deciders is a bad idea, and at the same time you kinda understand the impulse.
December 5, 2025 at 7:51 PM
I really want to believe that democracy means all adults should vote to shape our world ... but it's hard to justify that wish sometimes.
Having landed gentry being the only deciders is a bad idea, and at the same time you kinda understand the impulse.
Having landed gentry being the only deciders is a bad idea, and at the same time you kinda understand the impulse.