@truthhawk.bsky.social
Bring all of his lieutenants before Congress to testify under oath, whether he gave that order or not. And if the drunk Secy. did not issue the order, who did?
If he did it, demand his IMMEDIATE resignation and referral to The Hague. We must use this moment to reestablish the rule of law.
If he did it, demand his IMMEDIATE resignation and referral to The Hague. We must use this moment to reestablish the rule of law.
November 30, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Bring all of his lieutenants before Congress to testify under oath, whether he gave that order or not. And if the drunk Secy. did not issue the order, who did?
If he did it, demand his IMMEDIATE resignation and referral to The Hague. We must use this moment to reestablish the rule of law.
If he did it, demand his IMMEDIATE resignation and referral to The Hague. We must use this moment to reestablish the rule of law.
Frank Luntz has made a great career turning language against us, "job creators" and all. Dems are really slow to appreciate the power of words and the fact that these weapons have to be opposed actively, every day.
November 28, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Frank Luntz has made a great career turning language against us, "job creators" and all. Dems are really slow to appreciate the power of words and the fact that these weapons have to be opposed actively, every day.
We must stop playing the game on Republican terms. When they say "oppressive regulations", the correct term for that is "Consumer protections". They are not "loosening regulations". They are ELIMINATING CONSUMER PROTECTIONS.
November 28, 2025 at 2:10 AM
We must stop playing the game on Republican terms. When they say "oppressive regulations", the correct term for that is "Consumer protections". They are not "loosening regulations". They are ELIMINATING CONSUMER PROTECTIONS.
without any training in urban policing or mental health issues.
November 28, 2025 at 12:50 AM
without any training in urban policing or mental health issues.
We have gun violence and mental health problems in the US. The WV Nat'l Guard was never trained to deal with either of those things. She should not have been there, and a court found the deployment illegal just 4 days before she was killed, but Trump got the ruling stayed so he could appeal.
November 28, 2025 at 12:48 AM
We have gun violence and mental health problems in the US. The WV Nat'l Guard was never trained to deal with either of those things. She should not have been there, and a court found the deployment illegal just 4 days before she was killed, but Trump got the ruling stayed so he could appeal.
We will learn 6 months from now that they made a big donation to Trump's ballroom fund, plus a retroactive payment to Trump's inaugural fund. And the DoJ is probably including fine print in the settlement that they can re-open it if the company fails to make regular tribute payments in the future.
November 27, 2025 at 4:08 AM
We will learn 6 months from now that they made a big donation to Trump's ballroom fund, plus a retroactive payment to Trump's inaugural fund. And the DoJ is probably including fine print in the settlement that they can re-open it if the company fails to make regular tribute payments in the future.
Sorry, when somebody mentions a Samaritan, I just can't resist linking one of my favorite videos. I'm a bad person. www.youtube.com/watch?v=66-3...
Jesus and The Samaritan
YouTube video by Giop Saus
www.youtube.com
November 26, 2025 at 3:15 AM
Sorry, when somebody mentions a Samaritan, I just can't resist linking one of my favorite videos. I'm a bad person. www.youtube.com/watch?v=66-3...
The case was brought by the AP because Trump is preventing reporters from covering the people's business. How is that frivilous?
November 25, 2025 at 2:39 PM
The case was brought by the AP because Trump is preventing reporters from covering the people's business. How is that frivilous?
"Judge Robert L. Wilkins pressed Roth on whether the president is ever bound by First Amendment principles"
This is the very definition of the First Amendment. The President is employed by the people. The White House is the people's property, not the President's.
This is the very definition of the First Amendment. The President is employed by the people. The White House is the people's property, not the President's.
November 25, 2025 at 2:37 PM
"Judge Robert L. Wilkins pressed Roth on whether the president is ever bound by First Amendment principles"
This is the very definition of the First Amendment. The President is employed by the people. The White House is the people's property, not the President's.
This is the very definition of the First Amendment. The President is employed by the people. The White House is the people's property, not the President's.
He would fit right in with all the other ignorant, loudmouth jerks in the Trump regime.
November 25, 2025 at 2:32 PM
He would fit right in with all the other ignorant, loudmouth jerks in the Trump regime.
And then the maid tapped on his door saying "Mr President we have your breakfast ready for you sir. Are you awake sir?"
November 23, 2025 at 4:54 PM
And then the maid tapped on his door saying "Mr President we have your breakfast ready for you sir. Are you awake sir?"
The guy has not even taken office yet and they still are attacking him. The legacy news industry is on its way out because they no longer are performing their intended role as envisioned by the founding fathers.
November 23, 2025 at 4:52 PM
The guy has not even taken office yet and they still are attacking him. The legacy news industry is on its way out because they no longer are performing their intended role as envisioned by the founding fathers.
No, he wants street gangs to do it for him.
Trump is a MOBSTER in every respect.
Trump is a MOBSTER in every respect.
November 23, 2025 at 3:25 AM
No, he wants street gangs to do it for him.
Trump is a MOBSTER in every respect.
Trump is a MOBSTER in every respect.
I am willing to give Massie the benefit of the doubt that he has seen the extent of this global extortion/money laundering/kompromat operation and is speaking in good faith. He may believe that some Dems will get nailed in the process, but so far, he seems even-handed. Hold all players accountable.
November 20, 2025 at 3:00 PM
I am willing to give Massie the benefit of the doubt that he has seen the extent of this global extortion/money laundering/kompromat operation and is speaking in good faith. He may believe that some Dems will get nailed in the process, but so far, he seems even-handed. Hold all players accountable.
No. It is just Trump acknowledging that a bunch of Republicans are going to vote against him this week. Now he can claim it was his idea.
November 17, 2025 at 2:03 PM
No. It is just Trump acknowledging that a bunch of Republicans are going to vote against him this week. Now he can claim it was his idea.
They scrubbed them months ago. This is just Trump trying to save face when a bunch of House Republicans vote against him this week.
November 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM
They scrubbed them months ago. This is just Trump trying to save face when a bunch of House Republicans vote against him this week.
They should be offended that this is what passes for a mental exercise in the USA, while other countries are developing robots advanced green tech and so on. Stop celebrating dumbness.
November 15, 2025 at 11:55 PM
They should be offended that this is what passes for a mental exercise in the USA, while other countries are developing robots advanced green tech and so on. Stop celebrating dumbness.
Trump can give them literally anything. Money. Powerful jobs. A life of leisure. Or they could have an unfortunate accident.
If these are really the only 4 Republicans that want to have the files released, they will be bought -- and threatened.
Never bet on the integrity of a Republican.
If these are really the only 4 Republicans that want to have the files released, they will be bought -- and threatened.
Never bet on the integrity of a Republican.
November 12, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Trump can give them literally anything. Money. Powerful jobs. A life of leisure. Or they could have an unfortunate accident.
If these are really the only 4 Republicans that want to have the files released, they will be bought -- and threatened.
Never bet on the integrity of a Republican.
If these are really the only 4 Republicans that want to have the files released, they will be bought -- and threatened.
Never bet on the integrity of a Republican.
Loomer is so right. Surely there must have been a better day to invite a heinous murdering terrorist to a red carpet honor at the White House.
November 12, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Loomer is so right. Surely there must have been a better day to invite a heinous murdering terrorist to a red carpet honor at the White House.
NYC cost of housing solved. That was quick.
November 8, 2025 at 12:24 AM
NYC cost of housing solved. That was quick.
A full partner. Trump and Epstein worked for the same Agency, After all, and they were both laundering money for this Agency throughout the 00's. It was natural that the Agency would step this up to a Kompromat operation. Trump's main role was to bring in "the best people" to be Kompromised.
October 30, 2025 at 4:20 PM
A full partner. Trump and Epstein worked for the same Agency, After all, and they were both laundering money for this Agency throughout the 00's. It was natural that the Agency would step this up to a Kompromat operation. Trump's main role was to bring in "the best people" to be Kompromised.
"He never addressed me as 'Mayor'". That's brilliant. And if he had, this DeBlasio could have demurred, "Oh please, just call me 'Bill'. I'm not the Mayor. Now, how can I help you?" That would have made them even more certain they had the right guy.
October 30, 2025 at 4:14 PM
"He never addressed me as 'Mayor'". That's brilliant. And if he had, this DeBlasio could have demurred, "Oh please, just call me 'Bill'. I'm not the Mayor. Now, how can I help you?" That would have made them even more certain they had the right guy.
Nobody puts out $130,000,000 without something big in return. At minimum, I bet this guy is expecting to be repaid in full plus 5% per month.
October 25, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Nobody puts out $130,000,000 without something big in return. At minimum, I bet this guy is expecting to be repaid in full plus 5% per month.
Send him back to his own country. Oh wait, he was born in Puerto Rico, so he has exactly the same rights to citizenship as Margie Taylor (there ain't no Greene). Hey, I wonder if the Lawrence Welk Orchestra is available for SB halftime.
October 6, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Send him back to his own country. Oh wait, he was born in Puerto Rico, so he has exactly the same rights to citizenship as Margie Taylor (there ain't no Greene). Hey, I wonder if the Lawrence Welk Orchestra is available for SB halftime.
Was anybody in that group in uniform? Did any of them present any ID? Were any of them carrying anything that might have been warrants? The Chicago police should put them under surveillance. It looks like a bunch of people doing a poor job of impersonating police officers.
October 3, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Was anybody in that group in uniform? Did any of them present any ID? Were any of them carrying anything that might have been warrants? The Chicago police should put them under surveillance. It looks like a bunch of people doing a poor job of impersonating police officers.