Poorly and incorrectly using AI I might add.

Also, the link I shared seems to be acting weird, but it’s to @orinkerr.bsky.social’s “A Theory of Law.” Which, despite its length and the complexity, I have read in its entirety.

I think it’s a symptom of requiring *every* basic proposition to be supported with a citation. In such cases, it’s tempting to cite a sentence that looks on point at first glance without reading the whole article. Now they’re using AI to further reduce the burden.

www.greenbag.org/v16n1/v16n1_...

Will do!

I just finished episode 2, and my impression was definitely not the same as yours. I have no clue whatsoever where it’s going, but feels like it’s going somewhere!

You can select what jurisdiction you want CoCounsel to look at, so if you select “10th Circuit,” it will only pull cases and standards from the 10th Circuit.

Obviously I’d still double check everything, but it’s possible that the rep just did a bad job demonstrating the tool.

Isn’t the brief about constitutional avoidance? Congress could obviously amend or repeal the birthright citizenship statute, but that would just ripen the 14th Amendment issue.

Idk how deciding the case on statutory grounds could imply that Congress could change the constitutional meaning.