The Goose 🇨🇦
banner
the-goose-media.bsky.social
The Goose 🇨🇦
@the-goose-media.bsky.social
Honking at the end of the world from somewhere in Canada 🇨🇦

Run by @aaronhm.bsky.social

Join the flock! https://tr.ee/WVqQEoiK8I
CCS is not designed to save the planet. It’s designed to save the fossil fuel industry.

Learn more in my latest video about the Carney Smith MOU
youtu.be/smDEzOiai10
The Truth About Canada's New "Sustainable" Pipeline Deal | The Goose 🇨🇦
YouTube video by The Goose
youtu.be
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Except don’t forget you’re giving it billions in subsidies. They’re getting you to pay them to build an industrial strength greenwashing machine all so they can look like they’re doing something good for the planet while getting an excuse to expand the fossil fuel industry.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
To fill a new pipeline, you need to boost output by 1M barrels/day, so total emissions will rise—no matter how much CCS trims the “intensity.” The only thing that matters is the total, and it will go up 📈. But hey, at least we get more money, right?
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Even if Pathways works perfectly (it won’t), its max capacity is 12M tonnes a year. Oil sands production creates 88M tonnes. So like 13% in Best Case Scenario reductions. That’s not a climate plan; it’s a rounding error.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Pathways is pegged at ~$16B, which will come from the private sector. But thanks to the MOU and the new federal budget, there are subsidies to build it, subsidies to run it, and subsidies to extract more oil, all tied to building a new pipeline!
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Where does the CO2 go? Almost all of it goes to “enhanced oil recovery”pumping more oil out of wells that would’ve stayed put. CCS was literally invented to squeeze out extra barrels. This MOU allows for CCS to be used for enhanced oil recovery. In other words, it makes the climate worse.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Example 2: Quest CCS in Alberta released 2.7M more tonnes of CO2 than it captured over several years—and cost taxpayers over $700M. Pathways will be far bigger and far pricier.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Example 1: Boundary Dam, Sask. Touted as “clean coal,” it ran about 50% below target and burned through more than $200M in public subsidies.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
When will it get built? Maybe it will break ground in 2029. Meanwhile other climate policies - like the clean electricity standard - get nuked so we can go all in on a higher pollution price meant to incentivize this CCS project.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Quick refresher: CCS only reduces emissions from producing oil and gas. It doesn’t touch tailpipes. This MOU hinges on building the world’s largest CCS project: Pathways Plus.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
CCS is old tech Canada has hyped for decades. We were talking about it during Harper! But the history of CCS is littered with blown budgets, failed targets, and public money sucked away from solutions that actually cut emissions.
December 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Always appreciated 👍
December 4, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Is that what they call it? Haha
December 4, 2025 at 8:31 PM
I’m not super knowledgeable on immigration so I’d need to do some research but yeah there has been a hard turn against immigration and immigrants over the last few years and boy does it freak me out.
November 26, 2025 at 11:19 PM
I’m so glad you enjoyed it!
November 26, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Thank you for the shout out!! ✌️
November 25, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Thanks for the shout out!
November 20, 2025 at 7:19 PM