I think my favorite post of that was the cultexpert guy Steven Hassan was talking about how he had to pause often and "stay meta" to not get convinced by the hypno videos.

She should really have just followed the instructions to leave it there and closed the door and got out instead of assuming the worst.

I mean yeah there's no proof he was doing anything on purpose but I still get why she would be uncomfortable. Especially since it seems like everyone is trained to be neurotic these days by the internet panopticon society we built. This never should have been Newsworthy, but alas.

Elite NYT columnists watching nearly every British party descend into the same blob of cultural grievance and especially against trans people and immigrants: Damn, we need to gaslight the Democrats into becoming this insane too, it'd be great for our rage click metrics. 👍

That island really is losing all right for its residents to comment on anywhere else 💀

As a pilot that evacuates people who are having a medical emergency? Like a flying ambulance driver?

Franklin Avoids Nebulous Scary Buzzword

Its quite simple really: whatever you say you are, you aren't, because I'm a smart elite so I know better than you peons on absolutely every topic.

Loud British man on YouTube told me so, and he must be right because loud equals funny and British equals smart and funny equals true.

Ans of course by cases I mean countries. America has it, Europe and Asian countries also have privacy laws like this. And they're good for women because imagine a doordash guy peeping through women's windows, for example. Then all this gets thrown to the Court of Public Opinion, made a spectacle.

It is in most cases. I understand why she would feel uncomfortable and record in the moment to prove what she saw to doordash but they were right to terminate her account after bringing that public. But the moment she showed him pantsless to tiktok and his house number she crossed the line.