I was reading the "today" bit 😅 the more I think about it the more I think this can't be right in the chemical sciences generally. For some areas it definitely makes sense though

We should totally do a study on where the original guard of chemtwitter were and are now. It would be interesting... to us 😅

Absolutely been there with the disincentived reporting... long time ago in a previous job. It was almost poetic, complete failure that looked like success. Funny (but not really) that problem wasn't just us!
Not sure I've seen fuller solutions than blunt needles (which can't be used everywhere obvs)

Not that these are not worthy of highest honours, I just don't think this is precisely the argument for it. For physics, maybe it works there

Counterpoint: most of the scientists using Python (are they really a majority in chemistry and biology???? Not in my parts of chem they ain't) are not using top of the range algorithms - and even when they do, the tasks they're doing don't meaningfully benefit from them

It's in my profile on here 😂

"Do you want to accommodate ape-warriors in your lab? Then buy our tip boxes! They are ergonomically designed for ape hands, and the colours work perfectly for all primate vision" - probably

Possibly! We are very cool 😂

Nah but they make science happen (sometimes...) so very welcome! 🙌🙌🎉

"...different".

Anyway, now I'm sitting in the dark, because the cat wants to watch the fireworks 🙄😂

And thank you! :)

It's not a huge deal, it's basically just accrediting you for a few things like contributing to the chemistry community, but I think it's nice and it was also somewhat useful to get the evidence together so I think about what I'm doing in life/have it in one place, you know?