screenshot if you, understandably, don't want to go there:

From the Evening Standard:

Something smells and its not clear where it comes from. The text includes a section on a MoU versus an appendix to the TAC. I'm not an expert but MoUs are not regarded that lightly. The UK's largest military support deal (by value) is underpinned by a MoU.

From Google AI:

Oops

Turnout over the same timescale (courtesy of UK Political data):

This is a screenshot of the detailed section. In Norway it raises 0.4% of GDP as tax, equivalent to £10B in the UK, not £32B.

This was the reply I got after I complained about platforming Flagrage. What they fail to take into account is how much of the poll lead is down to platforming in the first place.

I complained to the BBC about their continual platforming of RefUK Ltd/Flagrage. Their response amounts to, if he leads the polls, he has more right to set the agenda than the Govt of the day actually in power. Extract follows:

I answered this question and screenshot the answers. The main difference seems to be about 10% was knocked off the completely unacceptable and added to the don't knows; weird eh?

snapshot from earlier today - 19% support this crap but 71% don't

On the Terrorism Act 2000 from Hansard (Lord Hanson for the govt)

The phrase ‘take back our streets’ was probably intended to be in language to have wide appeal (I'm being generous). This is what the text said: