Stanford Law Review
@stanlrev.bsky.social
A legal publication run by @StanfordLaw.bsky.social students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.
stanfordlawreview.org
stanfordlawreview.org
Expanding public-carry regimes challenge Terry’s reasonable-suspicion standard. In some states, suspected gun possession alone can’t justify stops. @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social warns an emerging “firearm exceptionalism” sustains racialized, hindsight-based policing.
The Emerging Firearms Hypocrisy of <em>Terry</em>: The Fifth Circuit in <em>United States v. Wilson</em> | Stanford Law Review
Terry v. Ohio’s flexible reasonable-suspicion rule is colliding with the post-Bruen expansion of public carry. In United States v. Wilson, the Fifth
www.stanfordlawreview.org
November 24, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Expanding public-carry regimes challenge Terry’s reasonable-suspicion standard. In some states, suspected gun possession alone can’t justify stops. @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social warns an emerging “firearm exceptionalism” sustains racialized, hindsight-based policing.
In this SLRO Essay, @fredhalbhuber.bsky.social traces the APA’s “set aside” instruction to 19th-century state codes where courts vacated orders universally—not just as to the parties—and shows that the APA inherits this tradition that authorizes universal vacatur.
A Remedy Inherited: State Law, Universal Vacatur, and the Meaning of “Set Aside” | Stanford Law Review
Introduction This past June, in a decision already heralded as marking a “landmark shift in administrative law,” the Supreme Court in Trump v. CA
www.stanfordlawreview.org
November 19, 2025 at 8:45 PM
In this SLRO Essay, @fredhalbhuber.bsky.social traces the APA’s “set aside” instruction to 19th-century state codes where courts vacated orders universally—not just as to the parties—and shows that the APA inherits this tradition that authorizes universal vacatur.
After Dobbs, the right to contraception appears uncertain—but in this SLRO essay, Deborah Tuerkheimer argues the greater threats lie beyond the Court. Funding cuts, parental and conscience-based claims, and misinformation are eroding access even as formal protections remain.
Threats to Contraception | Stanford Law Review
Many question the future of the right to contraception after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, but Deborah Tuerkheimer argues that the m
www.stanfordlawreview.org
November 6, 2025 at 8:53 PM
After Dobbs, the right to contraception appears uncertain—but in this SLRO essay, Deborah Tuerkheimer argues the greater threats lie beyond the Court. Funding cuts, parental and conscience-based claims, and misinformation are eroding access even as formal protections remain.
In discussion with @theregreview.bsky.social, Matthew J. Sanders discusses his forthcoming SLR article on the “little-known but highly consequential” administrative-remand rule. Sanders will present his work as a part of SLR's 2026 Admin Law Symposium. www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/s...
The Power of Procedure in Environmental Law | The Regulatory Review
Matthew J. Sanders explores the importance of procedure in the evolving environmental law landscape.
https://www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/spotlight-the-power-of-procedure-in-environmental-law/"
September 24, 2025 at 7:31 PM
In discussion with @theregreview.bsky.social, Matthew J. Sanders discusses his forthcoming SLR article on the “little-known but highly consequential” administrative-remand rule. Sanders will present his work as a part of SLR's 2026 Admin Law Symposium. www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/s...
SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Monday, September 15, at 5:00 PM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
Online Essay Submissions | Stanford Law Review
review.law.stanford.edu
September 6, 2025 at 8:55 PM
SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Monday, September 15, at 5:00 PM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
SLR Online Special Symposium Essays are now available on our website! We have 8 Essays about executive actions, constitutional boundaries, and the rule of law in Trump II. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/
Stanford Law Review Online | Stanford Law Review
www.stanfordlawreview.org
July 23, 2025 at 3:14 PM
SLR Online Special Symposium Essays are now available on our website! We have 8 Essays about executive actions, constitutional boundaries, and the rule of law in Trump II. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/
SLR’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica portal open tomorrow, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT! We look forward to reviewing your submissions!
July 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM
SLR’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica portal open tomorrow, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT! We look forward to reviewing your submissions!
SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
June 19, 2025 at 9:57 PM
SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
Online Essay Submissions | Stanford Law Review
review.law.stanford.edu
May 12, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
We are excited to announce our Special Symposium in partnership with the Stanford Neukom Center for the Rule of Law: “100 Days of The Trump Administration: Constitutional Boundaries on Executive Power & the Rule of Law.” review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...
review.law.stanford.edu
April 11, 2025 at 2:19 AM
We are excited to announce our Special Symposium in partnership with the Stanford Neukom Center for the Rule of Law: “100 Days of The Trump Administration: Constitutional Boundaries on Executive Power & the Rule of Law.” review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...