Sandra Raponi
@sraponi.bsky.social
Philosophy professor, Honors faculty.
JD, PhD. Political & legal philosophy, global justice, international human rights law.
Human rights-based climate litigation, refugees, free speech.
Zen Buddhism.
From Toronto 🇨🇦, now in MA.
JD, PhD. Political & legal philosophy, global justice, international human rights law.
Human rights-based climate litigation, refugees, free speech.
Zen Buddhism.
From Toronto 🇨🇦, now in MA.
Reposted by Sandra Raponi
For more on why it is absolutely incumbent upon #SCOTUS to provide even a modicum of explanation when it intervenes to upset the status quo in cases like these, see this "One First" bonus post from June 26:
www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-161-...
www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-161-...
Bonus 161: Why the Court Needs to Explain Itself
The continuing fallout from Monday afternoon’s ruling in the third-country removals case is an object lesson for why the justices should be providing explanations when they grant emergency relief.
www.stevevladeck.com
July 14, 2025 at 7:47 PM
For more on why it is absolutely incumbent upon #SCOTUS to provide even a modicum of explanation when it intervenes to upset the status quo in cases like these, see this "One First" bonus post from June 26:
www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-161-...
www.stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-161-...