milk steak nation
@sourpickles.bsky.social
Singer-songwriter magic doesn’t care about statistical reasoning
November 11, 2025 at 6:08 AM
Singer-songwriter magic doesn’t care about statistical reasoning
Changing it from within will be more effective if we don’t accept the pretense that it was just 8 rogue Dems
November 10, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Changing it from within will be more effective if we don’t accept the pretense that it was just 8 rogue Dems
This is false. What was under seal was grand jury testimony and evidence, not the files and evidence held by the FBI — what we are now calling “the Epstein files.”
November 10, 2025 at 9:59 PM
This is false. What was under seal was grand jury testimony and evidence, not the files and evidence held by the FBI — what we are now calling “the Epstein files.”
The shorter path to the goal is capturing the party and its apparatus by primarying collaborative centrists and replacing them with more progressive representatives
November 10, 2025 at 8:42 PM
The shorter path to the goal is capturing the party and its apparatus by primarying collaborative centrists and replacing them with more progressive representatives
Doubtful. The Biden admin had four years to release those files, but didn’t. I suspect that it isn’t only prominent Republicans who are implicated by them.
November 10, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Doubtful. The Biden admin had four years to release those files, but didn’t. I suspect that it isn’t only prominent Republicans who are implicated by them.
The didn’t vote to end the shutdown, they voted to allow the shutdown to end! It’s totally different!
November 10, 2025 at 8:08 PM
The didn’t vote to end the shutdown, they voted to allow the shutdown to end! It’s totally different!
Georgia state law only allows pardoning *after* the criminal sentence has been served
November 10, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Georgia state law only allows pardoning *after* the criminal sentence has been served
The would have to change Georgia law, which only allows pardons *after time served*
November 10, 2025 at 12:52 PM
The would have to change Georgia law, which only allows pardons *after time served*
Wait, are you unaware that Senate Dems just said, “please don’t tear it all down, please don’t make us have to rebuild, change will not be good, we’re not ready to go with what the public is all for”?
November 10, 2025 at 4:22 AM
Wait, are you unaware that Senate Dems just said, “please don’t tear it all down, please don’t make us have to rebuild, change will not be good, we’re not ready to go with what the public is all for”?
Democratic voters handed the party a historic result on Tuesday, the *same week* Dem Senators captitulated to Republicans, and you think this is about “the reactionary ‘left’?”
You can’t be serious
You can’t be serious
November 10, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Democratic voters handed the party a historic result on Tuesday, the *same week* Dem Senators captitulated to Republicans, and you think this is about “the reactionary ‘left’?”
You can’t be serious
You can’t be serious
It’s worth noting that nowhere did they say “no blame on the republicans, all the dems fault”
November 10, 2025 at 3:58 AM
It’s worth noting that nowhere did they say “no blame on the republicans, all the dems fault”
You believe the Dem caucus spontaneously produced just enough votes, all of which are from seats that are either retiring or are not up for reelection in 2026
Sweet summer child
Sweet summer child
November 10, 2025 at 3:43 AM
You believe the Dem caucus spontaneously produced just enough votes, all of which are from seats that are either retiring or are not up for reelection in 2026
Sweet summer child
Sweet summer child
None of the yes votes are from seats up in 2026, this should answer your question
November 10, 2025 at 3:21 AM
None of the yes votes are from seats up in 2026, this should answer your question
It’s mere coincidence that every Dem yes vote is from a seat not up for reelection in 2026, totally unplanned
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 AM
It’s mere coincidence that every Dem yes vote is from a seat not up for reelection in 2026, totally unplanned
He ran as the Democratic candidate, so that might be a question for Mamdani
November 8, 2025 at 11:22 PM
He ran as the Democratic candidate, so that might be a question for Mamdani
*strangers wearing bulletproof vests and not experiencing a reasonable fear of injury as a result of the sandwich
November 8, 2025 at 3:30 PM
*strangers wearing bulletproof vests and not experiencing a reasonable fear of injury as a result of the sandwich
Obesity is defined medically, not normatively
In principle, *everyone* in his demographic could be obese
But yes, fully agree, his talent is sociopathy
(But he’s also, likely, obese)
In principle, *everyone* in his demographic could be obese
But yes, fully agree, his talent is sociopathy
(But he’s also, likely, obese)
November 7, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Obesity is defined medically, not normatively
In principle, *everyone* in his demographic could be obese
But yes, fully agree, his talent is sociopathy
(But he’s also, likely, obese)
In principle, *everyone* in his demographic could be obese
But yes, fully agree, his talent is sociopathy
(But he’s also, likely, obese)
Every Central Pennsylvanian kid knows the mnemonic, “Bears stride, Bigfoots glide”
November 7, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Every Central Pennsylvanian kid knows the mnemonic, “Bears stride, Bigfoots glide”
(90’s movie trailer voice)
HE WAS RETIRING AND IT WAS HIS LAST FLIGHT EVER
HE WAS RETIRING AND IT WAS HIS LAST FLIGHT EVER
November 7, 2025 at 10:50 PM
(90’s movie trailer voice)
HE WAS RETIRING AND IT WAS HIS LAST FLIGHT EVER
HE WAS RETIRING AND IT WAS HIS LAST FLIGHT EVER
Actually, it *doesn’t* meet the technical definition in SC, which requires bodily injury or intent to bodily injure
law.justia.com/codes/south-...
law.justia.com/codes/south-...
2024 South Carolina Code of Laws :: Title 16 - Crimes and Offenses :: Chapter 3 - Offenses Against The Person :: Section 16-3-600. Assault and battery; definitions; degrees of offenses.
Justia Free Databases of U.S. Laws, Codes & Statutes
law.justia.com
November 7, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Actually, it *doesn’t* meet the technical definition in SC, which requires bodily injury or intent to bodily injure
law.justia.com/codes/south-...
law.justia.com/codes/south-...
But there is no law that says you can’t hit someone with a sandwich, so that fact by itself doesn’t give them grounds to convict
November 7, 2025 at 10:12 PM
But there is no law that says you can’t hit someone with a sandwich, so that fact by itself doesn’t give them grounds to convict
By this logic, can’t someone who has their citizenship revoked demand a new U.S. passport, on the basis that their citizenship is a historical fact?
November 7, 2025 at 6:00 AM
By this logic, can’t someone who has their citizenship revoked demand a new U.S. passport, on the basis that their citizenship is a historical fact?