Man sues dog, dog asserts affirmative defenses: discuss distinction between contributory and comparative negligence

You wouldn’t say this if you’d ever had to live under an unreasonable toilet paper limitation

For real. In a decent society, none of us would ever have to even learn these words

If this trial balloon actually floats, I will set this country on fire

Amen

Sir. ONLY the second wipe can reveal if the first wipe was enough.

Please do not make me admire a football player

Keaneu Reeves

Team radical change

It would also be the last gasp of any of our romantic notions about being professionals, as opposed to businesspeople.

Trump rapes girls? Shrug. Dog bites man.

That’s particularly disgusting because “fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings” typically means “let’s make sure young rapists can use the threat of re-traumatizing their victims to discourage attempts to hold them to account.”

🏆

I don’t care how they see him, so long as we see the back of him and his whole ugly movement

Yes!

If anyone knows maritime law, it’s England

I hope you’re right. I’ve learned never to underestimate the ability of the US electorate to be dumb about stuff.

Well, it was a required part of his uniform, but not provided. Officers bought their own from private tailors and they were only as nice as you could afford. His distinction was to wear it in the old-fashioned "athwartships" manner rather than the then-modern "fore-and-aft" fashion. Nelson stan.