Sophie E. Hill
banner
sophieehill.bsky.social
Sophie E. Hill
@sophieehill.bsky.social
PoliSci PhD student @ Harvard / 🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈 / Creator of MyLittleCrony.com
Signal: @sehill.11
The journal Sustainability is really stretching the concept of "regression table" in the year of our lord 2025.

Left:
Frankenstein's monster (t-stats vs SEs in parentheses in the same table)

Right:
two rows of values in parentheses after the coefficient... BOGOF?

pubpeer.com/publications...
November 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM
question: what thresholds were used to label the coefficients as statistically significant?

answer: yes

pubpeer.com/publications...

pubpeer.com/publications...

pubpeer.com/publications...
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Unfortunately these researchers really need to be reported for cruel and discriminatory treatment of their test statistics...

I mean, look! This poor t-stat -0.53 gets NO STARS, while his almost-identical neighbour -0.52 get TWO STARS.

That's not fair! 😡😠😖
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
This paper comes courtesy of two researchers at the Northeast Petroleum University in Daqing, China.

They've been on quite a run this year.

As well as this one, they have two more in Sustainability, both accepted in <40 days.
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
SIX cases of max < min. It's an epidemic.

And even if we "correct" the table by flipping those around, we'd still have a mean that's not contained in [min, max], plus his Large Adult Son, SD = 3.409 (bigger than the range!)

So maybe for that row in particular, they switched min/max AND mean/sd?
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 PM
The top search results for "Claire Pan" "Cornell University" point to someone who majored in "Applied Economics and Management" and graduated with an undergraduate degree in 2020.

If this is the right person, then she reviewed this paper (Mar/Apr 2022) while working at a venture capital firm... 🤔
November 24, 2025 at 11:45 AM
There are very few scholars involved in this Research Topic (as editors, reviewers or authors) who are NOT at an institution in China.

One notable exception is "Claire Pan, Cornell University", who reviewed this paper: www.frontiersin.org/journals/env...
November 24, 2025 at 11:45 AM
This paper is part of a Frontiers "Research Topic" co-edited by Wenqiu Ma, Guanghui Jiang and Yanbo Qu, in which:

WM edits a paper by GJ & YQ
YQ edits a paper by WM & GJ
WM edits / YQ reviews a paper by GJ
WM, GJ, YQ were previously coauthors

www.frontiersin.org/research-top...
November 24, 2025 at 11:45 AM
well knock me down with a feather! you're telling me this paper was published in that bastion of credibility, Frontiers in Environmental Science??

shurely shome mishtake?

www.frontiersin.org/journals/env...
November 24, 2025 at 10:18 AM
❌ Error 1 (level: EASY)

Solid waste has mean (0.624) > max (0.525)

❌ Error 2 (level: MEDIUM)

Solid waste and fiscal revenue have SD > range/2

0.53 > (0.525-0.1)/2 = 0.2125
0.926 > (1.2-0.024)/2 = 0.588
November 24, 2025 at 10:18 AM
(in case you were wondering)
November 24, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Good morning!

Today is a day ending in "y", which means I found another mathematically-impossible Table of Summary Statistics in a peer-reviewed "green economics" paper!

What can you see? 🔎

#FablesofFlummeryStatistics
November 24, 2025 at 10:18 AM
readers of @forbetterscience.bsky.social might recognize the editor on this paper...
November 22, 2025 at 2:39 PM
and here's the paper (open-access):

www.frontiersin.org/journals/env...
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
next up we have one coefficient that looks off by a factor of 10.

god knows how that happened. but the lesson, as ever, is ABP (Always Be Plotting)

plot your raw data. plot your summary statistics. plot your model coefficients. plot your enemy's downfall. plot your residuals.
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
and that tortured phrase was NOT an "abnormal sample point", aka an "outlier" 😅
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
"reverse osmosis process" appears to be a tortured phrase

(original phrase was probably: "reverse technology spillover")
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
so naturally i had a look for other red flags in the paper.

can you see anything wrong in this paragraph?

(DISCLAIMER: Several English language phrases were harmed in the making of this paper.)
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
crunching the numbers for ya
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
this example is unusual because there are a few breadcrumbs indicating what went wrong...

* Means got duplicated in SD column
* SD values appear in Min column (or at least, these values = sqrt(var))
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
rows 1, 2, 6 look ok ✅

but rows 3, 4, 5 have:

mean > max
min > max

!!
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
lads i found ANOTHER Table of Impossible Summary Statistics in a "green economics" paper 🚩

Can you see the problem?
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Interesting. The ones I'm reading are definitely *not* well-written, though my initial sample was retracted papers. Any good examples you could share?

The questions that are still bugging me...
November 21, 2025 at 10:39 AM
OpenAlex search results for "nexus" under the Energy/Environment/Economic Growth category:

openalex.org/works?page=1...

Check out the frequent fliers: 1/3rd of ALL of Bekun's published papers have "nexus" in title or abstract!
November 21, 2025 at 1:12 AM