Najčešće radnim danom, ali ne uvijek. Nađe se rupa u prometu, zapravo prvenstveno treba izbjegavati petak navečer i subote. Ne garantiram za kolovoz.
June 28, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Najčešće radnim danom, ali ne uvijek. Nađe se rupa u prometu, zapravo prvenstveno treba izbjegavati petak navečer i subote. Ne garantiram za kolovoz.
Meni zna uletiti neki znanstveni razlog za ići na taj daleki sjever, pa ulovim rupe u gužvama.
June 27, 2025 at 6:53 AM
Meni zna uletiti neki znanstveni razlog za ići na taj daleki sjever, pa ulovim rupe u gužvama.
Svaka čast - najružnija jahta je ispala super!
April 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Svaka čast - najružnija jahta je ispala super!
Nabacio bih ovdje da u Hrvatskoj ima oko 27% visokoobrazovanih, pri čemu je Zagreb na 40%, Istra na 26%, a ostale županije uglavnom (bitno!) lošije.
April 1, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Nabacio bih ovdje da u Hrvatskoj ima oko 27% visokoobrazovanih, pri čemu je Zagreb na 40%, Istra na 26%, a ostale županije uglavnom (bitno!) lošije.
Many people struggle with word problems in maths. I'd really like to see any specific correlation of word problem issues and ADHD.
Word problems are inherently synaesthetic, while technical drill ones are repetitive, boring and test for not-making-mistakes.
Word problems are inherently synaesthetic, while technical drill ones are repetitive, boring and test for not-making-mistakes.
February 27, 2025 at 6:51 AM
Many people struggle with word problems in maths. I'd really like to see any specific correlation of word problem issues and ADHD.
Word problems are inherently synaesthetic, while technical drill ones are repetitive, boring and test for not-making-mistakes.
Word problems are inherently synaesthetic, while technical drill ones are repetitive, boring and test for not-making-mistakes.
That's what owning the means of production does.
B2B market I believe is similar, though with a veneer of economic rationality to it. A company usually has (or can create) capacity to do something in-house, so it weighs its options.
B2B market I believe is similar, though with a veneer of economic rationality to it. A company usually has (or can create) capacity to do something in-house, so it weighs its options.
February 3, 2025 at 7:34 PM
That's what owning the means of production does.
B2B market I believe is similar, though with a veneer of economic rationality to it. A company usually has (or can create) capacity to do something in-house, so it weighs its options.
B2B market I believe is similar, though with a veneer of economic rationality to it. A company usually has (or can create) capacity to do something in-house, so it weighs its options.
Ja bih prvo pomislio na ova čuda.
January 29, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Ja bih prvo pomislio na ova čuda.
1. Koja je to knjiga?
2. Čudilo bi me da su te bitve bile te topovske cijevi, a ne one kocke s prstenima kojih ima na puntama Valkana i Valsalinama.
2. Čudilo bi me da su te bitve bile te topovske cijevi, a ne one kocke s prstenima kojih ima na puntama Valkana i Valsalinama.
January 28, 2025 at 8:49 AM
1. Koja je to knjiga?
2. Čudilo bi me da su te bitve bile te topovske cijevi, a ne one kocke s prstenima kojih ima na puntama Valkana i Valsalinama.
2. Čudilo bi me da su te bitve bile te topovske cijevi, a ne one kocke s prstenima kojih ima na puntama Valkana i Valsalinama.
Uhjoj. Još da je Perl, dalo bi se oprostiti loš spelling. :)
Kod Pythona je baš princip neka opća urednost i ljepota - "beautiful is better than ugly": peps.python.org/pep-0020/
Kod Pythona je baš princip neka opća urednost i ljepota - "beautiful is better than ugly": peps.python.org/pep-0020/
PEP 20 – The Zen of Python | peps.python.org
Long time Pythoneer Tim Peters succinctly channels the BDFL’s guiding principles for Python’s design into 20 aphorisms, only 19 of which have been written down.
peps.python.org
January 22, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Uhjoj. Još da je Perl, dalo bi se oprostiti loš spelling. :)
Kod Pythona je baš princip neka opća urednost i ljepota - "beautiful is better than ugly": peps.python.org/pep-0020/
Kod Pythona je baš princip neka opća urednost i ljepota - "beautiful is better than ugly": peps.python.org/pep-0020/
Ako ništa ponovi spelling Pythona ;)
January 22, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Ako ništa ponovi spelling Pythona ;)
You should always verify LLM output, especially if you gave it little contextual information.
It will use the dialect of whatever you may have triggered its attention to, but what it claims in the content has little reason to be more than plausible.
So, use it to get the lingo, not the meat.
It will use the dialect of whatever you may have triggered its attention to, but what it claims in the content has little reason to be more than plausible.
So, use it to get the lingo, not the meat.
November 29, 2024 at 9:17 PM
You should always verify LLM output, especially if you gave it little contextual information.
It will use the dialect of whatever you may have triggered its attention to, but what it claims in the content has little reason to be more than plausible.
So, use it to get the lingo, not the meat.
It will use the dialect of whatever you may have triggered its attention to, but what it claims in the content has little reason to be more than plausible.
So, use it to get the lingo, not the meat.
My personal preference is to use naturals as if starting from 0. Very typical in CS-adjacent maths, a lot less so in physics-adjacent maths.
If ℕ starts from 0, then ℕ* excludes it.
If ℕ starts from 1, then ℕ₀ denotes naturals and zero.
If ℕ starts from 0, then ℕ* excludes it.
If ℕ starts from 1, then ℕ₀ denotes naturals and zero.
November 23, 2024 at 7:16 PM
My personal preference is to use naturals as if starting from 0. Very typical in CS-adjacent maths, a lot less so in physics-adjacent maths.
If ℕ starts from 0, then ℕ* excludes it.
If ℕ starts from 1, then ℕ₀ denotes naturals and zero.
If ℕ starts from 0, then ℕ* excludes it.
If ℕ starts from 1, then ℕ₀ denotes naturals and zero.