Drew Jones
@skiptotheend.bsky.social
World's leading Dunning-Kruger expert.
"Learning to question narratives or sources... is part of growing up."
An uncharitable reading might assume she thinks she is done with such childish things now she is grown up. Certainly questioning her is verboten.
An uncharitable reading might assume she thinks she is done with such childish things now she is grown up. Certainly questioning her is verboten.
December 3, 2025 at 7:43 PM
"Learning to question narratives or sources... is part of growing up."
An uncharitable reading might assume she thinks she is done with such childish things now she is grown up. Certainly questioning her is verboten.
An uncharitable reading might assume she thinks she is done with such childish things now she is grown up. Certainly questioning her is verboten.
This wasn't a mistake. It was intentional provocation to get a bad grade and then run to the media and cry oppression to justify their demands that trans people are further marginalised.
December 1, 2025 at 6:50 PM
This wasn't a mistake. It was intentional provocation to get a bad grade and then run to the media and cry oppression to justify their demands that trans people are further marginalised.
I read it more as a tone-deaf celebration of GC institutional power. Hope you're right though.
November 29, 2025 at 12:41 PM
I read it more as a tone-deaf celebration of GC institutional power. Hope you're right though.
Finally, the guys that ruined their marriage because they thought ChatGPT was flirting with them have a guy to mock.
November 28, 2025 at 8:12 AM
Finally, the guys that ruined their marriage because they thought ChatGPT was flirting with them have a guy to mock.
Why should people have to suffer your ignorance quietly?
November 27, 2025 at 12:30 PM
Why should people have to suffer your ignorance quietly?
That's fine if you want to. Strikes me as naive. If we are to patronise political commentators and assume they can't effectively communicate their true ideas, we shouldn't platform or credit them until they can do their job.
I don't think Phillips is incompetent.
I don't think Phillips is incompetent.
November 25, 2025 at 9:54 AM
That's fine if you want to. Strikes me as naive. If we are to patronise political commentators and assume they can't effectively communicate their true ideas, we shouldn't platform or credit them until they can do their job.
I don't think Phillips is incompetent.
I don't think Phillips is incompetent.
That is what the article hopes for. You might think better of the man but the article is right there.
November 25, 2025 at 9:28 AM
That is what the article hopes for. You might think better of the man but the article is right there.
Vaccinating myself against this by injecting them all directly into my eyeballs.
November 22, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Vaccinating myself against this by injecting them all directly into my eyeballs.
"Why are you denying my experience." Said the GC frog to the GC scorpion.
November 22, 2025 at 1:00 PM
"Why are you denying my experience." Said the GC frog to the GC scorpion.
It's 'coming over here, taking our jobs' all over again.
November 22, 2025 at 3:23 AM
It's 'coming over here, taking our jobs' all over again.
Also the first time drink ever managed a drink at the World Cup.
November 19, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Also the first time drink ever managed a drink at the World Cup.
'Can you design us an English pub sign?'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
November 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM
'Can you design us an English pub sign?'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
'Sure, do you have any consistent theme or traditional English pub motifs'
'No.'
'Good, I was just going to use an Art Deco typeface anyway.'
'Perfect.'
Peter Thetankengine Thompson.
November 17, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Peter Thetankengine Thompson.
You can have first-hand, inside knowledge of the workings of Tavistock or the BBC. If you think you have both you're overestimating your powers of insight and have an insatiable need for media validation.
November 15, 2025 at 9:52 PM
You can have first-hand, inside knowledge of the workings of Tavistock or the BBC. If you think you have both you're overestimating your powers of insight and have an insatiable need for media validation.
Again, no. Linking the highest and lowest pay is not a glass ceiling. The top end can go as high it's financially viable to take everyone else with them. After all it's the same organisation, same profit.
November 7, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Again, no. Linking the highest and lowest pay is not a glass ceiling. The top end can go as high it's financially viable to take everyone else with them. After all it's the same organisation, same profit.
You keep referring to monkeys and peanuts without considering how many people perform, high-risk/important jobs well without being compensated anywhere near £500k. The idea that CEOs are rarified and must be paid hundreds of times what they expect any 'normal' person does is indefensible.
November 6, 2025 at 11:47 PM
You keep referring to monkeys and peanuts without considering how many people perform, high-risk/important jobs well without being compensated anywhere near £500k. The idea that CEOs are rarified and must be paid hundreds of times what they expect any 'normal' person does is indefensible.
Again, no one is saying checkout staff would be on £450k. We're saying CEO pay being 360x minimum wage has been normalised but is not ethical or justifiable without projecting ridiculous scenarios onto the conversation.
November 6, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Again, no one is saying checkout staff would be on £450k. We're saying CEO pay being 360x minimum wage has been normalised but is not ethical or justifiable without projecting ridiculous scenarios onto the conversation.
No one is saying it's an accident. He took over the running of an already successful national supermarket. He and other CEOs should have the biggest paycheck in the company, just not one so massively out of range of the other people contributing to the £70bn.
November 6, 2025 at 8:55 PM
No one is saying it's an accident. He took over the running of an already successful national supermarket. He and other CEOs should have the biggest paycheck in the company, just not one so massively out of range of the other people contributing to the £70bn.
Sure, that's how hierarchies work but he would have planned little and implemented none which is why he would be paid the most but should not be credited with the whole £70bn.
November 6, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Sure, that's how hierarchies work but he would have planned little and implemented none which is why he would be paid the most but should not be credited with the whole £70bn.
Did he alone generate 70bn or was it the whole Tesco workforce?
November 6, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Did he alone generate 70bn or was it the whole Tesco workforce?
Nope. There is no credit in making the right choice in taking an action almost everyone else does. Only shame and condemnation for those that don't.
November 3, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Nope. There is no credit in making the right choice in taking an action almost everyone else does. Only shame and condemnation for those that don't.