Simon Wood
@simongwood.bsky.social
Broadcast Executive Producer, Shooting Director, Editor, Writer.
Very good. Not before time.
December 6, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Very good. Not before time.
There is a monster in the White House, a monster so cunning and so dastardly there's nothing it will not do to feed its colossal appetite for untrammeled dominion.
December 6, 2025 at 8:36 PM
There is a monster in the White House, a monster so cunning and so dastardly there's nothing it will not do to feed its colossal appetite for untrammeled dominion.
"In the history of the institution" means "Everything I've just said is a lie". Whenever we hear anything that sounds even remotely like a superlative from this corrupt Republican party, remember, it's designed to cover the fact that what preceded it or what follows is completely untrue.
December 6, 2025 at 8:07 PM
"In the history of the institution" means "Everything I've just said is a lie". Whenever we hear anything that sounds even remotely like a superlative from this corrupt Republican party, remember, it's designed to cover the fact that what preceded it or what follows is completely untrue.
Stop playing with words in order to mislead people. It's pathetic and it's deeply dishonest. Good God, man, get a grip.
December 6, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Stop playing with words in order to mislead people. It's pathetic and it's deeply dishonest. Good God, man, get a grip.
Oh, and by the way, this absurd idea that the amount of media coverage a party gets should somehow be proportional to the amount of seats it has in Parliament is so utterly ridiculous it's laughable.
December 6, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Oh, and by the way, this absurd idea that the amount of media coverage a party gets should somehow be proportional to the amount of seats it has in Parliament is so utterly ridiculous it's laughable.
But, in doing that you made undeniably false statements. If you don't want to be corrected, check your facts BEFORE you write and stick to them whilst you're writing. If you embellish the truth with liberal sprinklings of fantasy expect to get jumped on.
December 6, 2025 at 2:14 PM
But, in doing that you made undeniably false statements. If you don't want to be corrected, check your facts BEFORE you write and stick to them whilst you're writing. If you embellish the truth with liberal sprinklings of fantasy expect to get jumped on.
I've corrected your false statements. That's all I set out to do. If you choose to lose yourself in absurd conspiracy theories about everyone you don't like being in cahoots with everyone else you don't like, then that's entirely your own affair.
December 6, 2025 at 1:58 PM
I've corrected your false statements. That's all I set out to do. If you choose to lose yourself in absurd conspiracy theories about everyone you don't like being in cahoots with everyone else you don't like, then that's entirely your own affair.
Now you're just being disingenuous. You know perfectly well that we were talking about the UK and you yourself were referring to the UK when you placed Sky and BBC QT into the same sentence. You are misleading people and I will always intervene to correct people who post falsities.
December 6, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Now you're just being disingenuous. You know perfectly well that we were talking about the UK and you yourself were referring to the UK when you placed Sky and BBC QT into the same sentence. You are misleading people and I will always intervene to correct people who post falsities.
You are misleading people and it would be remiss of me to allow that to stand. I am protecting no-one, merely correcting blatant inaccuracies. If the only way you can promote your political thesis is by inventing false conspiracies, I suggest the problem lies with your thesis and nowhere else.
December 6, 2025 at 12:24 PM
You are misleading people and it would be remiss of me to allow that to stand. I am protecting no-one, merely correcting blatant inaccuracies. If the only way you can promote your political thesis is by inventing false conspiracies, I suggest the problem lies with your thesis and nowhere else.
Why are you trying to mislead people? First, your inaccurate tirade referred to the UK, not Australia. Second, Sky Australia only licences the name 'Sky' from Comcast, which owns it. They are two entirely separate companies with zero editorial connections. You're a conspiracy theorist. Cut the crap.
December 6, 2025 at 11:55 AM
Why are you trying to mislead people? First, your inaccurate tirade referred to the UK, not Australia. Second, Sky Australia only licences the name 'Sky' from Comcast, which owns it. They are two entirely separate companies with zero editorial connections. You're a conspiracy theorist. Cut the crap.
Meaning himself presumably.
December 6, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Meaning himself presumably.
Christ, the sycophancy never even pauses to draw breath.
December 5, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Christ, the sycophancy never even pauses to draw breath.
Pathetic, isn't it? Does he realise how pitifully weak he makes himself look?
December 5, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Pathetic, isn't it? Does he realise how pitifully weak he makes himself look?
Sky Australia is owned by the Murdochs, Sky UK is owned by Comcast. Is that too hard for you?
December 5, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Sky Australia is owned by the Murdochs, Sky UK is owned by Comcast. Is that too hard for you?
To be clear, Sky Australia is owned by the Murdochs, Sky UK is owned by Comcast. Give your head a wobble, mate.
December 5, 2025 at 9:06 PM
To be clear, Sky Australia is owned by the Murdochs, Sky UK is owned by Comcast. Give your head a wobble, mate.
The King exercises no powers other than those he is advised to exercise by the government on its behalf or which he is obliged to exercise in the manner laid out for him by convention. The Constitution renders him effectively powerless. Playing with words doesn't change that state of affairs.
December 5, 2025 at 9:03 PM
The King exercises no powers other than those he is advised to exercise by the government on its behalf or which he is obliged to exercise in the manner laid out for him by convention. The Constitution renders him effectively powerless. Playing with words doesn't change that state of affairs.
I agree. We shouldn't assume anything. We shouldn't assume it was an accident or that it was a deliberate attack. In the absence of verifiable evidence that would be stupid.
December 5, 2025 at 8:30 PM
I agree. We shouldn't assume anything. We shouldn't assume it was an accident or that it was a deliberate attack. In the absence of verifiable evidence that would be stupid.
That isn't any kind of claim. It's a warning to exercise caution before staking a claim.
December 5, 2025 at 8:22 PM
That isn't any kind of claim. It's a warning to exercise caution before staking a claim.
Pathetic. FIFA Peace Prize totally discredited from the off. Who the hell would want to get awarded that after this monstrous pig?
December 5, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Pathetic. FIFA Peace Prize totally discredited from the off. Who the hell would want to get awarded that after this monstrous pig?
Right. Clearly you feel much more comfortable with a speculative narrative than with certainty built on objectively verifiable facts. Your prerogative of course.
December 5, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Right. Clearly you feel much more comfortable with a speculative narrative than with certainty built on objectively verifiable facts. Your prerogative of course.
Assuming it was an attempted strike. All too often these things turn out to be innocent mistakes, misreported stories or unfortunate coincidences so perhaps most people are waiting to hear what actually happened and why.
December 5, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Assuming it was an attempted strike. All too often these things turn out to be innocent mistakes, misreported stories or unfortunate coincidences so perhaps most people are waiting to hear what actually happened and why.
Anyone would think he's making shit up.
December 5, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Anyone would think he's making shit up.
Highly unlikely I'd say. Netflix has always been seen as more of a TV interloper than a moviemaker. This makes Netflix a major movie player so it's a big step up for its brand perception. But it also gives it access to linear TV creating huge new revenue opportunities for its existing back catalogue
December 5, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Highly unlikely I'd say. Netflix has always been seen as more of a TV interloper than a moviemaker. This makes Netflix a major movie player so it's a big step up for its brand perception. But it also gives it access to linear TV creating huge new revenue opportunities for its existing back catalogue