I watched the presser and came away reasonably sure it was incompetence mixed with Saudi lawlessness.

“Forget the myths the media has created about the White House. The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

Not in favour of dismemberment. Obvs.

It’s a good read but it’s more wrong that right about who Steve was.

daringfireball.net/2012/02/walt...

The ‘sheer relief’ is doing a lot of work here. Relief from what-having to consider that maybe politicians across the spectrum reacted quickly because there are legitimate questions about consistency and proportionality? He doesn’t actually answer those questions, he just assumes they’re bad faith.

I don’t find it repulsive at all. It’s capitalism working.

If you want change put together a party that’s worth voting for. If it comes down to voting for someone preachy or someone crazy then people choose crazy, at least crazy listens to them.

Please make “shoot it with lasers” one of your options.

She wrote an honest book. That’s all. It’s not racist to do that.

I think it unlikely, The Bookseller whitewashed all the shenanigans at the @rsliterature.bsky.social, when they ignored the criteria for fellows, brought their mates in, and threw Kate Clanchy under a bus. Then told a whole pack of lies about it.
I expect the publisher to be utterly spineless.

I see nothing wrong. It’s honest reporting.

Hate crime. Blocked and reported.

Hate crime. Blocked and reported.

I found the racist report, look at the horrific racism on p19

Unbelievable. Lets cancel the authors.

www.channel4sales.com/resources/ne...

Please go back to your comedy articles or humanity TV, I miss them. You're approaching Blocked and Reported levels of intellectual dishonesty (I bet you defended black Ariel or Jodie Turner-Smith as Anne Boleyn). In fact you're Deadpool.

youtu.be/YlZ1xpm2h1k?...

A perfect epistemic trap: data exists and was published by progressive institutions but anyone who references it is motivated by racial animus. This doesn't protect minorities - it protects corporations doing performative representation from scrutiny while making empirical discussion impossible.
/5