The parents are reprehensible, but the kids aren't far off since they haven't gone no-contact with these fucking loosers yet.

Hahahaha damn you're stupid

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight there with ya, mate. It's infuriating!

Again, it's not that Green's point is inherently wrong, but instead that his methodology is completely flawed and he also doesn't show his sources for some of his key claims.

It's cool that we disagree though. Thanks for the conversation and have a great rest of your Thanksgiving!

Yeah, the difference in defining poverty seems to be the real kicker. Becker uses the defined term that we've used for decades while Green uses fuzzy math to reach a "vibey" term of poverty.

Here's an explainer on how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

Here's an explainer on how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

I've been sharing this link lately where @cnbecker14.bsky.social explains how his methodology is extremely flawed.

www.tiktok.com/@divasunglas...

thanks internet stranger friend! 🫂

Haha right on - I'm in the same boat. I saw the screenshot and got curious, so I looked up the account.

GOMS!

That's a parody account, FWIW

I rewatched it for the first time after Andor ended and was blown away by how bad it was compared to both my memory of it and the show it spawned.

"basically a chop job" is the perfect way to put it.

yOu’rE On hErE EnGaGiNg iN AnTiSeMiTiSm oN A ReGuLaR BaSiS

It is mistaken to assume anybody is uninfluenced by regular exposure to propaganda or disinformation.

"they don't have a 5th starter."

Uh...huh? News to me! 😅

These two morons squawking incorrectly at each other is amazing. It's like watching my two cats debate astrophysics by licking their assholes.

I gotta hear the case for Gio!

On the flip side, if you take a hypothetical state that's 65% red - 35% blue and you voter suppress enough that the state government is 95% red, then you get a vastly different outcome of laws than if it was only 65% red.