Shubhendu Trivedi
banner
shubhendu.bsky.social
Shubhendu Trivedi
@shubhendu.bsky.social
Interests on bsky: ML research, applied math, and general mathematical and engineering miscellany. Also: Uncertainty, symmetry in ML, reliable deployment; applications in LLMs, computational chemistry/physics, and healthcare.
https://shubhendu-trivedi.org
Ah, sorry, I used to keep posting about the theme over here (although now I have stopped), so accidentally continued on that. But a brief summary in this set of responses (to save a bombardment of replies) x.com/_onionesque/... I find open peer review important for different structural reasons.
November 30, 2025 at 9:21 PM
I am more interested in this not because of "peer review" directly, but because I think it is one very concrete aspect by which you could make a difference to a far more serious structural problem that keeps eroding the legitimacy of the whole enterprise.
November 30, 2025 at 5:36 PM
The fully non-blind review process that I am aware of is by F1000 (which I do happen to like). But various venues that offer to opt-in typically wait till after the decisions have been made to make names public.
November 30, 2025 at 5:18 PM
It will accelerate in about 2-3 years IMO -- when after sufficient trial and error, enough money burnt into smoke, orgs would have paid enough to earn the (non-tech) expertise.
November 29, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Business adoption is only slowing because developing the right AI strategy will take time. Knowing how to use it, where to ise it, how to re-engineer a portion of your your org around a new co-pilot (for instance) for it to actually shine, how to implement change management, is the hard part.
November 29, 2025 at 6:33 PM
The likely consequence of this might be a persistent underinvestment in foundational scientific, mathematical, and (core) engineering capacities. But I wonder how can that be quantified.
November 27, 2025 at 8:44 PM
encourage generating deep human capital formation. It may have instead displaced it, replacing slow, cumulative intellectual development, with immediately monetizable competence (which seems to have lower transferability over time). [+]
November 27, 2025 at 8:44 PM
One can see that it caused a massive demand shock that may have permanently altered the human capital trajectory of an entire set of cohorts. It has this interesting facet (which is often lampooned, correctly) that a lot of it appears "high-skill" on the surface, but clearly does not [+]
November 27, 2025 at 8:44 PM
He seems to like the imprecise probability framings. But I like the idea that if you have some plausibility-based ideas of what the object at hand, you should be more efficient. Surely this can't be the first paper on the theme (beyond imprecise formulations)?
November 27, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Still trying to understand some stuff around more general e-processes. Do you know of any generalizations that have a similar flavor?
November 27, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Unrelatedly, another concrete (maybe niche-seeming) area seeing major disruptions is in revenue management. While there isn't any data on this, quite a few of my friends have mentioned how many customer success and junior analyst roles have been automated (this is fully believable/ML-attributable).
November 27, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Note that the 70% figure is not readily attributable to AI. The world economy is in doldrums, and such jobs usually get very tight in such periods. But whatever the true percentage, the combined effects already seem to be re-shaping the whole industry (tighter budgets combined with more tools).
November 27, 2025 at 3:50 AM
Slightly more lucrative used to be in the video game industry. Not uniformly studied, but in some places (such as China) there were reports of up to 70% job losses restofworld.org/2023/ai-chin... two years ago. Also true for NGOs and for campaign illustration. content marketing etc.
AI is already taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China
“AI is developing at a speed way beyond our imagination. Two people could potentially do the work that used to be done by 10.”
restofworld.org
November 27, 2025 at 3:45 AM
Some of the most anti AI people I know IRL (very offline. Despite my frequency of posting, I am also not very online, barely lurk, just post in bursts and sign out) happen to be illustrators. A large bulk of their work was 'commodity' illustration e.g. like on mugs, for websites etc.
November 27, 2025 at 3:45 AM
For instance, take stock illustrations in magazines and newspapers now. They are far less likely to be credited. While for sure someone reviewed and created it, it was more likely to be created by AI tools (this needs a study to quantify the real size of effects, since it's easily measurable).
November 27, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Writing is a different ball game. Logo designers, illustrators overwhelmingly freelance. It's also about shaping the idea, but the relation is a bit different. A large amount of work is for stock illustrations and concept figures, which are easier to offload. I had read 40% reduction in job postings
November 27, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Illustration and graphics design markets are quite disrupted. They were moderately growing a few years ago, and now starting to completely crater in the past two years.
November 27, 2025 at 3:04 AM
*can you get any-time validity
November 26, 2025 at 8:07 PM