Sheri W.
@sheriw60.bsky.social
I try to post info Dems & Normal SANE people may like & find informative! I will bring ATTN/awarenesses to TRUMP'S illogical & illegal acts & anything I share is true w/citation (usually to Fed. Statutes)! ❌I DON'T converse w/MAGA people! F U, get lost!!❌
Pg 2... CARRIED OUT... ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR THAT AS IF ONE HAD PARTICIPATED ONE'S SELF... BASICALLY A CO-CONSPIRATOR PER ARTICLE 94 (para. 3) UCMJ... What they did by reminding others of duty to ignore ILLEGAL ORDERS should be covered under Article 94 (3)... Also, UCMJ is ONLY...Con't Pg3
November 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Pg 2... CARRIED OUT... ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR THAT AS IF ONE HAD PARTICIPATED ONE'S SELF... BASICALLY A CO-CONSPIRATOR PER ARTICLE 94 (para. 3) UCMJ... What they did by reminding others of duty to ignore ILLEGAL ORDERS should be covered under Article 94 (3)... Also, UCMJ is ONLY...Con't Pg3
Pg 2... Successful at a "Sedition"... NO Fed. Laws would exist any longer! Also..."Seditious Conspiracy" carries a MAXIMUM punishment of 20 yrs in prison NOT death!!
Bottom line... The PSA the 6 Dems did was 100% correct! In military one MUST refuse an ILLEGAL ORDER! I KNOW FOR FACT AS A VETERAN!
Bottom line... The PSA the 6 Dems did was 100% correct! In military one MUST refuse an ILLEGAL ORDER! I KNOW FOR FACT AS A VETERAN!
November 23, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Pg 2... Successful at a "Sedition"... NO Fed. Laws would exist any longer! Also..."Seditious Conspiracy" carries a MAXIMUM punishment of 20 yrs in prison NOT death!!
Bottom line... The PSA the 6 Dems did was 100% correct! In military one MUST refuse an ILLEGAL ORDER! I KNOW FOR FACT AS A VETERAN!
Bottom line... The PSA the 6 Dems did was 100% correct! In military one MUST refuse an ILLEGAL ORDER! I KNOW FOR FACT AS A VETERAN!
@bluewavesurfer.bsky.social
As well they should be! I'm a Veteran who took the oath 4 times & served all my time on active duty but can honestly say...I hope every one of those M Fers are Court Martialed for: Failure to adhere to their oath & prevent a wrong (they know it's a wrong) & murder!
As well they should be! I'm a Veteran who took the oath 4 times & served all my time on active duty but can honestly say...I hope every one of those M Fers are Court Martialed for: Failure to adhere to their oath & prevent a wrong (they know it's a wrong) & murder!
November 22, 2025 at 4:24 AM
@bluewavesurfer.bsky.social
As well they should be! I'm a Veteran who took the oath 4 times & served all my time on active duty but can honestly say...I hope every one of those M Fers are Court Martialed for: Failure to adhere to their oath & prevent a wrong (they know it's a wrong) & murder!
As well they should be! I'm a Veteran who took the oath 4 times & served all my time on active duty but can honestly say...I hope every one of those M Fers are Court Martialed for: Failure to adhere to their oath & prevent a wrong (they know it's a wrong) & murder!
@repstansbury.bsky.social
🚨 Congresswoman Stansbury: THEY CAN'T LEGALLY PASS THIS BS LEGISLATION BECAUSE YOU'RE 100% CORRECT... TRIBAL LAND IS PROTECTED BY TRIBAL *TREATIES!!*
PLEASE DON'T FORGET... TREATIES *ARE ALSO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND* PER ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 2 OF U.S. CONSTITUTION!! 🚨
🚨 Congresswoman Stansbury: THEY CAN'T LEGALLY PASS THIS BS LEGISLATION BECAUSE YOU'RE 100% CORRECT... TRIBAL LAND IS PROTECTED BY TRIBAL *TREATIES!!*
PLEASE DON'T FORGET... TREATIES *ARE ALSO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND* PER ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 2 OF U.S. CONSTITUTION!! 🚨
November 21, 2025 at 11:35 PM
@repstansbury.bsky.social
🚨 Congresswoman Stansbury: THEY CAN'T LEGALLY PASS THIS BS LEGISLATION BECAUSE YOU'RE 100% CORRECT... TRIBAL LAND IS PROTECTED BY TRIBAL *TREATIES!!*
PLEASE DON'T FORGET... TREATIES *ARE ALSO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND* PER ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 2 OF U.S. CONSTITUTION!! 🚨
🚨 Congresswoman Stansbury: THEY CAN'T LEGALLY PASS THIS BS LEGISLATION BECAUSE YOU'RE 100% CORRECT... TRIBAL LAND IS PROTECTED BY TRIBAL *TREATIES!!*
PLEASE DON'T FORGET... TREATIES *ARE ALSO THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND* PER ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 2 OF U.S. CONSTITUTION!! 🚨
@pbsnews.org
RE: WAY uneducated F45 talking sh-t & spewing more BS/lies about the 6 Congress Mbrs...I'm clarifying 3 things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
RE: WAY uneducated F45 talking sh-t & spewing more BS/lies about the 6 Congress Mbrs...I'm clarifying 3 things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
November 21, 2025 at 8:23 PM
@pbsnews.org
RE: WAY uneducated F45 talking sh-t & spewing more BS/lies about the 6 Congress Mbrs...I'm clarifying 3 things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
RE: WAY uneducated F45 talking sh-t & spewing more BS/lies about the 6 Congress Mbrs...I'm clarifying 3 things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
@kylegriffin1.bsky.social
@muellershewrote.com
RE: F45 talking sh-t on Fox & spewing more BS...I'm clarifying a few things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
@muellershewrote.com
RE: F45 talking sh-t on Fox & spewing more BS...I'm clarifying a few things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
November 21, 2025 at 7:38 PM
@kylegriffin1.bsky.social
@muellershewrote.com
RE: F45 talking sh-t on Fox & spewing more BS...I'm clarifying a few things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
@muellershewrote.com
RE: F45 talking sh-t on Fox & spewing more BS...I'm clarifying a few things:
1) There's NO Fed. Statute for: "Seditious Behavior!"
2) The ONLY Fed. Statute RE: "Seditious" whatever is: 18 USC 2384 "Seditious Conspiracy!"
3) Max punishment is 20 yrs!
@atrupar.com
Miller's a moron! Art. 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Miller's a moron! Art. 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
November 21, 2025 at 6:23 AM
@atrupar.com
Miller's a moron! Art. 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Miller's a moron! Art. 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
@wajali.bsky.social
Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the big one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the big one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
November 21, 2025 at 6:07 AM
@wajali.bsky.social
Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the big one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ address "LAWFUL ORDERS" but the big one military should worry about is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
November 21, 2025 at 6:02 AM
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
@cwebbonline.com
In your post you cite Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ & You're correct however... The big one you left out is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
In your post you cite Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ & You're correct however... The big one you left out is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
November 21, 2025 at 5:58 AM
@cwebbonline.com
In your post you cite Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ & You're correct however... The big one you left out is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
In your post you cite Articles 90, 91, & 92 of UCMJ & You're correct however... The big one you left out is Article 94! That's the Article of UCMJ referring to the fact *ONE CAN BE COURT MARTIALED FOR *NOT* TAKING PROPER ACTION WHEN ONE KNOWS OTHERS ARE ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL ACTS!*
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
November 21, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
November 21, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Pg 2... PSA commercial... Actually said! What they said comes NO WHERE NEAR meeting the required elements of "Seditious Conspiracy!" But, F45 has been violating 18 USC 2385 "Advocating to Overthrow Gov't" ever since he announced he was running for 2nd term in 2024! Why hasn't he been charged yet?!?
@thetnholler.bsky.social
You make mention of Rep. John Rose introducing a Bill to "undo" Sen. Marsha Blackburn's ATTEMPT to "grab" "multi-millions."
He does *NOT* need to introduce a Bill!! What they are doing by ATTEMPTING to make their $$ grab *RETROACTIVE*... THEY'RE VIOLATING CONSTITUTION!!
You make mention of Rep. John Rose introducing a Bill to "undo" Sen. Marsha Blackburn's ATTEMPT to "grab" "multi-millions."
He does *NOT* need to introduce a Bill!! What they are doing by ATTEMPTING to make their $$ grab *RETROACTIVE*... THEY'RE VIOLATING CONSTITUTION!!
November 13, 2025 at 2:54 AM
@thetnholler.bsky.social
You make mention of Rep. John Rose introducing a Bill to "undo" Sen. Marsha Blackburn's ATTEMPT to "grab" "multi-millions."
He does *NOT* need to introduce a Bill!! What they are doing by ATTEMPTING to make their $$ grab *RETROACTIVE*... THEY'RE VIOLATING CONSTITUTION!!
You make mention of Rep. John Rose introducing a Bill to "undo" Sen. Marsha Blackburn's ATTEMPT to "grab" "multi-millions."
He does *NOT* need to introduce a Bill!! What they are doing by ATTEMPTING to make their $$ grab *RETROACTIVE*... THEY'RE VIOLATING CONSTITUTION!!
Did you read my original post?!? 🤔 They are *NOT* "working" anyone "over in the Situation Room!" It's a done deal! NO ONE who signed can remove their name now! It's got 218... DONE!! OVER!! PERIOD!! Next stop... The floor vote! In case you failed to read my orig post... Here's a reminder for you...
November 13, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Did you read my original post?!? 🤔 They are *NOT* "working" anyone "over in the Situation Room!" It's a done deal! NO ONE who signed can remove their name now! It's got 218... DONE!! OVER!! PERIOD!! Next stop... The floor vote! In case you failed to read my orig post... Here's a reminder for you...
@jenrubin.bsky.social
I'm thinking by stating: "the corrupt give away to senators"... You refer to the GOP sneaking the BS "amendment" referring to 8 specific Senators allowing them to *RETROACTIVELY* sue for a valid subpoena for call logs. IT'S ILLEGAL PER CONSTITUTION! Art 1, Sec. 9, Cl. 3!
I'm thinking by stating: "the corrupt give away to senators"... You refer to the GOP sneaking the BS "amendment" referring to 8 specific Senators allowing them to *RETROACTIVELY* sue for a valid subpoena for call logs. IT'S ILLEGAL PER CONSTITUTION! Art 1, Sec. 9, Cl. 3!
November 13, 2025 at 1:53 AM
@jenrubin.bsky.social
I'm thinking by stating: "the corrupt give away to senators"... You refer to the GOP sneaking the BS "amendment" referring to 8 specific Senators allowing them to *RETROACTIVELY* sue for a valid subpoena for call logs. IT'S ILLEGAL PER CONSTITUTION! Art 1, Sec. 9, Cl. 3!
I'm thinking by stating: "the corrupt give away to senators"... You refer to the GOP sneaking the BS "amendment" referring to 8 specific Senators allowing them to *RETROACTIVELY* sue for a valid subpoena for call logs. IT'S ILLEGAL PER CONSTITUTION! Art 1, Sec. 9, Cl. 3!
‼️ TOO LATE NOW!! 🤣 THE WAY A DISCHARGE PETITION WORKS IS: A SIGNER *CAN* REMOVE NAME *PRIOR TO* THE NECESSARY 218 SIGNATURES BUT...ONCE THERE'S 218 SIGS... IT'S "LOCKED" AND A SIGNER CAN NO LONGER REMOVE NAME (SIGNATURE)!! GRIJALVA'S SIG BROUGHT IT TO 218 SO IT'S A DONE DEAL!! ‼️ SUCKS TO BE F45!! 🤣
November 13, 2025 at 12:36 AM
‼️ TOO LATE NOW!! 🤣 THE WAY A DISCHARGE PETITION WORKS IS: A SIGNER *CAN* REMOVE NAME *PRIOR TO* THE NECESSARY 218 SIGNATURES BUT...ONCE THERE'S 218 SIGS... IT'S "LOCKED" AND A SIGNER CAN NO LONGER REMOVE NAME (SIGNATURE)!! GRIJALVA'S SIG BROUGHT IT TO 218 SO IT'S A DONE DEAL!! ‼️ SUCKS TO BE F45!! 🤣
@fernandez.house.gov
CONGRESSWOMAN: YOU DON'T NEED TO EVEN ARGUE WITH THEM *OR* PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT IN RULES COMMITTEE!
BECAUSE THE IDIOT REPUBLICANS ARE MAKING THE SUE THE GOV'T RE: CELL PHN CALL LOGS *RETROACTIVE*...YOU ALREADY HAVE THE AMMO YOU NEED! IT'S ILLEGAL PER: ART. 1, SEC. 9, CL. 3!
CONGRESSWOMAN: YOU DON'T NEED TO EVEN ARGUE WITH THEM *OR* PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT IN RULES COMMITTEE!
BECAUSE THE IDIOT REPUBLICANS ARE MAKING THE SUE THE GOV'T RE: CELL PHN CALL LOGS *RETROACTIVE*...YOU ALREADY HAVE THE AMMO YOU NEED! IT'S ILLEGAL PER: ART. 1, SEC. 9, CL. 3!
November 13, 2025 at 12:24 AM
@fernandez.house.gov
CONGRESSWOMAN: YOU DON'T NEED TO EVEN ARGUE WITH THEM *OR* PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT IN RULES COMMITTEE!
BECAUSE THE IDIOT REPUBLICANS ARE MAKING THE SUE THE GOV'T RE: CELL PHN CALL LOGS *RETROACTIVE*...YOU ALREADY HAVE THE AMMO YOU NEED! IT'S ILLEGAL PER: ART. 1, SEC. 9, CL. 3!
CONGRESSWOMAN: YOU DON'T NEED TO EVEN ARGUE WITH THEM *OR* PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT IN RULES COMMITTEE!
BECAUSE THE IDIOT REPUBLICANS ARE MAKING THE SUE THE GOV'T RE: CELL PHN CALL LOGS *RETROACTIVE*...YOU ALREADY HAVE THE AMMO YOU NEED! IT'S ILLEGAL PER: ART. 1, SEC. 9, CL. 3!
The evil GOP snuck this provision in that they can sue Gov't for $500k RETROACTIVE cuz Jack Smith subpoenaed their cell phn call logs (NOT phn "tapping"... Just logs [number called/rvcd, what time, how long conversation]) for Jan 6... AFTER THE FACT (Dems unaware)! This IS ILLEGAL per Constitution!
November 13, 2025 at 12:01 AM
The evil GOP snuck this provision in that they can sue Gov't for $500k RETROACTIVE cuz Jack Smith subpoenaed their cell phn call logs (NOT phn "tapping"... Just logs [number called/rvcd, what time, how long conversation]) for Jan 6... AFTER THE FACT (Dems unaware)! This IS ILLEGAL per Constitution!
Personally I believe this will be immediately taken to court and stuck down by the court because... IT'S CLEARLY ILLEGAL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL PER Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3...!!
November 12, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Personally I believe this will be immediately taken to court and stuck down by the court because... IT'S CLEARLY ILLEGAL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL PER Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3...!!
@protectdemocracy.org
Pg 2... That CLEARLY make his use of the military in cities ILLEGAL! F45 depends on 10 USC 12406 however, it certainly appears that 10 USC 12304 §(d) supersedes 12406 on account 12304 was last amended in '23 but 406 hasn't been since '06! I'd refuse F45's ILLEGAL orders!
Pg 2... That CLEARLY make his use of the military in cities ILLEGAL! F45 depends on 10 USC 12406 however, it certainly appears that 10 USC 12304 §(d) supersedes 12406 on account 12304 was last amended in '23 but 406 hasn't been since '06! I'd refuse F45's ILLEGAL orders!
November 12, 2025 at 3:40 AM
@protectdemocracy.org
Pg 2... That CLEARLY make his use of the military in cities ILLEGAL! F45 depends on 10 USC 12406 however, it certainly appears that 10 USC 12304 §(d) supersedes 12406 on account 12304 was last amended in '23 but 406 hasn't been since '06! I'd refuse F45's ILLEGAL orders!
Pg 2... That CLEARLY make his use of the military in cities ILLEGAL! F45 depends on 10 USC 12406 however, it certainly appears that 10 USC 12304 §(d) supersedes 12406 on account 12304 was last amended in '23 but 406 hasn't been since '06! I'd refuse F45's ILLEGAL orders!
Listen to the clip... Dr. Oz is who said it yesterday at their "deal" signing shindig in The Oval Office... Straight up!! See for yourself!!
November 7, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Listen to the clip... Dr. Oz is who said it yesterday at their "deal" signing shindig in The Oval Office... Straight up!! See for yourself!!
A prosecutor *IS* a "trial attorney!"
November 7, 2025 at 4:15 AM
A prosecutor *IS* a "trial attorney!"
And the voters sent a very clear message to The Felon & what they think of him, his "policies", & MAGA!! Here's a metaphor for that message voters made crystal clear... Obviously as evidenced by the ass kickin' the Republicans took at the polls!! The voters said: We're DONE with this BS!!
November 7, 2025 at 2:56 AM
And the voters sent a very clear message to The Felon & what they think of him, his "policies", & MAGA!! Here's a metaphor for that message voters made crystal clear... Obviously as evidenced by the ass kickin' the Republicans took at the polls!! The voters said: We're DONE with this BS!!
MAGA Mike is like the Felon's Play-Doh! He can mold him into anything he wants & if he (F45) decides he doesn't like the figure anymore...He can squash it flat like a bug! MAGA Mike will allow himself to be manipulated because he is spineless! 🤣🤣
You have to be age 50+ to really "get" this pic! 🤣🤣
You have to be age 50+ to really "get" this pic! 🤣🤣
November 7, 2025 at 12:45 AM
MAGA Mike is like the Felon's Play-Doh! He can mold him into anything he wants & if he (F45) decides he doesn't like the figure anymore...He can squash it flat like a bug! MAGA Mike will allow himself to be manipulated because he is spineless! 🤣🤣
You have to be age 50+ to really "get" this pic! 🤣🤣
You have to be age 50+ to really "get" this pic! 🤣🤣
@barackobama.bsky.social
Mr. President: Just listening to you speak this weekend reminded me what an amazing speaker you are & that you're intelligent, make logical sense, & you're very articulate! **WE MISS YOU!** 😀🙌👍
So, I think we should start a new trend & troll the Hell out of F45! Why not?🤷🏻
Mr. President: Just listening to you speak this weekend reminded me what an amazing speaker you are & that you're intelligent, make logical sense, & you're very articulate! **WE MISS YOU!** 😀🙌👍
So, I think we should start a new trend & troll the Hell out of F45! Why not?🤷🏻
November 4, 2025 at 7:52 PM
@barackobama.bsky.social
Mr. President: Just listening to you speak this weekend reminded me what an amazing speaker you are & that you're intelligent, make logical sense, & you're very articulate! **WE MISS YOU!** 😀🙌👍
So, I think we should start a new trend & troll the Hell out of F45! Why not?🤷🏻
Mr. President: Just listening to you speak this weekend reminded me what an amazing speaker you are & that you're intelligent, make logical sense, & you're very articulate! **WE MISS YOU!** 😀🙌👍
So, I think we should start a new trend & troll the Hell out of F45! Why not?🤷🏻