She Guevara
banner
sheg7.bsky.social
She Guevara
@sheg7.bsky.social
Sammy. Mid 30s. Did some stuff, now does other stuff. Takes a blunt approach to sharp wit.

"Not everyone's cup of tea, but also nobody's mug"

🗳💚

Speaks: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🏳️‍⚧️
He wouldnt be allowed to do that within the green party, would he?

He is one man, with an exemplary voting record as MPs go. He would actually have less power to affect trans people under the greens banner, because he'd be bound by green policy. Your complaints dont really make sense.
November 30, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Its fine, I understand that misunderstandings happen. Its just sometimes people want to insist nefarious intent for the sake of having an argument. Im never actively looking to fall out with anyone, i assure you. We all good.
November 30, 2025 at 10:08 AM
As the reader, I have to piece together context at my end based on what was said, how it was said, and in reply to what. If the writer isnt considering those things, then effective communication is impossible

2/2
November 30, 2025 at 9:21 AM
But its a seperate paragrah eothin the comment... and you were replying to something specific that I had responded to someone else... you didnt start a new comment thread on the wider post, so how am I to know that you aren't continuing the thread-line that you were commenting in? 1/2
November 30, 2025 at 9:21 AM
That was a QT. I didnt start anything with a picture.

I saw a tweet about corbyn, I posted about corbyn.
November 30, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Why do you think I'm saying that you *should* waste your time on YP?!

What do you think my position is?!
November 30, 2025 at 9:10 AM
You had a follow up comment about the yorp being disappointing for the same reason - but your original statement was that "he might want trans people dead because he had never said otherwise"

You responded to me saying its ridiculous to say he wants trans people dead.
November 30, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Explain to me how I'm supposed to know you're talking about yorp conference! How am I to know what you are talking about specifically if you talk in broad terms?

Read your first comment to me again and tell me how im supposed to know that you arent speaking broadly.
November 30, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Thats a fucking stupid thing to say because you clearly haven't even looked to see what he has said.

Here is the first 2 things I found on a simple google search.

What's stopping you from making sure you have some substance to your assertions before believing them true?
November 30, 2025 at 8:51 AM
This other person is saying the same as you, essentially, and im.not writing it out again, so just read those responses

bsky.app/profile/sheg...
Fuck me. This is ridiculous.

This isn't an abstract discussion about the ideal political approach; nor a creation or assertion of a hierarchy of rights.

This is subjective, about a very specific situation that Corbyn found himself in, which has its own context. You're accusing me of having
1/3
November 29, 2025 at 11:06 PM
No, im not saying that. Those are all things that you've just said, which has nowt to do with anything I've said. 😆
November 29, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Exactly that. You cant do politics otherwise, and we obly have politics as a means to do it, so...

What choice do we have?
November 29, 2025 at 10:04 PM
The sooner the left realises that it needs more pragmatism and less idealism, the better. You dont have to compromise your ideals to be pragmatic, but you do have to be pragmatic to achieve your ideals.
November 29, 2025 at 9:58 PM
Im not saying trans rights dont matter. Im a trans woman.

But like...

What are you mad at? That he didn't follow your principals to the letter? C'mon.
November 29, 2025 at 9:43 PM
a coalition of independents to hold the government to account on its position with Israel. I refuse to begrudge him for that. People were getting blown to bits by missiles and kids used for target practice. People saying "yeah but what about trans rights" just sound like cunts.

3/3
November 29, 2025 at 9:42 PM
or defending a position that I dont actually hold - all because I said I empathise with his priorities in that scenario and think that, as an MP, he went with the most pressing concern. He defo did not consider trans people when he tried to form

2/3
November 29, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Fuck me. This is ridiculous.

This isn't an abstract discussion about the ideal political approach; nor a creation or assertion of a hierarchy of rights.

This is subjective, about a very specific situation that Corbyn found himself in, which has its own context. You're accusing me of having
1/3
November 29, 2025 at 9:42 PM
I dont think they will because the green membership is massive, and they wont have the numbers to sway party policy votes.

The left is gunna have to learn to work together, because the right isnt so picky. You gotta be more collaborative, and less combative. If you want combative, form a militia.
November 29, 2025 at 9:13 PM
I stg youre fucking illiterate, why are you on a text based platform if you cant comprehend the words?!
November 29, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Then your (understandable) hypersensitivity to the onslaught vs trans people is clouding your judgement, im afraid.
November 29, 2025 at 8:54 PM
SMH

I didnt imply trans people should die, anywhere. You implied I must mean that as a supposition. We/Me/You weren't thrown under the bus, because nothing happened as a result of it. Nothing. No affect on the material lives of trans people, and yourparty has fallen apart. This hysteria is silly.
November 29, 2025 at 8:52 PM