Given the AI-provenance, it’s not clear that the terms carry their ordinary sense — or indeed any sense at all.

Brilliant. I wonder how one appeals. I was fully expecting to be declared the most placid and wholesome account on here.

I’m puzzled; I could just imagine two ‘ho’s, as in a sardonic ‘ho ho’, but one? I tried a search and nothing came up. I think my record has been unfairly tarnished.

Anyone who is committed to the importance of higher education should very much agree with @danielagabor.bsky.social here:

Only the Greens have any serious ambition to deal with those two drags on the productive economy: student debt and private rents.

Well you certainly won’t get that from any of the other parties. Those universities lucky enough to survive the present government works need to very lucky indeed to survive another.

Here was an informed discussion:

web.archive.org/web/20170712...

When Labour put the abolition of student fees into their 2017 manifesto, they calculated that it would cost just over £11 billion. That, even given inflation, would easily be covered just by stopping HMT’s covering the BoE’s interest-payments on commercial bank deposits.

Ah. I forgot parakeets. Excellent.

Where do you find Aristotle saying that?

As here:

I think it’s a like colouring book.

Of course, it’s possible he didn’t have bigamy down as an aspiration.

Sorry; that wasn’t a helpful response to your actual question (which, as you can tell, piqued my interest).

when I feel some responsibility (I’m the speaker’s friend or relation, though not party to the conversation) or have some connection to the subject-matter of the assertion (it’s a falsehood about a friend).