This is not how college level assignments work. Just because it says "personal opinion" does not mean you write a 4th grade journal entry. You always have to cite real sources and use actual arguments instead of tautologies.

10 points to react and discuss the content of the article and how it relates to the class they are taking, which the student does not do at all, not mentioning one developmental psychological term. 5 points for "clarity of writing" and we can all see this rant is not at a college level of writing.

Did you read the criteria? 10 points for a "clear tie to article" which the paper does not cite, say the author's name, or really engages with what the article is about. (Could you give me a summary of what that unnamed article is about from this paper?).

What are you even saying? You sound like a deranged old hag

You seem like your brain is so old it doesn't work anymore. Fuckin nasty terf scum

Oldass person who double spaces after periods like they are writing on a typewriter claims they're able to think for themselves and adapt lol

An actual monarchy funds the website you write for

You really don't need to fantasize about hitting a retired nurse who loves sewing and liberalism because she is confused by a bad faith right winger

I think a fascist regime promoting the 80+ extrajudicial murders they have actually done is more serious than saying a supporter of pedophilia should be killed. I actually don't think the second one is wrong because I don't have the stunted morality of a tech bro

That's who she is defending. Anger also gets directed towards the defenders of evil people.

The actual dynamic is the NYT publishes stories based on how they affect the interests of its owners and their wealthy friends, to the point they bury damning information about the president to help cover PR when their journalist solicited bribes from a child trafficker.

Something is deeply wrong with you to plug your billionaire boss's vanity project while defending other elites from complicity in child trafficking

Not directing this at the OP, they didn't write it I don't think

and he also went insane on me during the solar eclipse last year telling me not to look at the eclipse cause it's actually a demon that the Mayans summoned thousands of years ago

Slicing it off with a boxcutter would relieve some of the shame, to me

I feel like people don't remember the same thing happened on old Twitter. There were just way more posts to obscure the annoying ones, and a lot of the time off-topic scold posts on something like a sports tweet were often hidden by moderation

How is this not at odds with what your organization has claimed its end product goals are? Is the thing your service claims to offer not a current reality? bsky.app/profile/hail...