This displays a profound lack of understanding of the type of work required of an individual IC inside a big team in a large corp, and a generalist in a scrappy startup.

The test might actually be okay! But it shows they're trying to recruit from the incompatible talent pool.

Daskom protiv išijasa!

Sounds (uncomfortably) close to going from individual contributor to managing a team, if at another (lower) level.

Star si.

misliš Pydantic?

... I'll see myself out

That's not programming, that's specification (and only applicable if you know the exact shade you want):

If you say "buy 1L of milk", you're not doing math, you're talking English. Same if you say "make the background 7DB097".

That's still English, as opposed to:

div.mydiv { background: #7DB097 }

Evo, i FINA može poslužiti, ako za ništa drugo, kao loš primjer.

Timely article on how searching for "the best" backfires: www.otherbranch.com/shared/blog/...

Those would simply have never gotten written before. They don't get committed. They're useful but not earth-shattering. They contain a ton of code, especially if Claude also generates tests for them. And no one's job is getting replaced by them, nor do they devalue proper software development.

Inb4 anyone things I'm just trolling:

> The core issue? Not the quality of the AI models, but the “learning gap” for both tools and organizations. While executives often blame regulation or model performance, MIT’s research points to flawed enterprise integration.

Mene je zaintrigirala kila svinjske masti ispod monitora...

Na drugoj slici su jedan od najvećih mislilaca prošlog stoljeća i Feynman.