I know people are concerned about this Ring thing, but you have to weigh the benefits. They said a dog a day, that's dozens, maybe hundreds of dogs found an hour sooner.

Surely that upside justifies putting us all in perpetual monitoring from everyone's front stoop on top of secret police.

/s

Hey @oldmantex.bsky.social, I thought you'd like to know Biden took office in 2021, not 2020. If this had gotten wide circulation that could be embarrassing.

I couldn't reply or quote tweet so this is the only way I could let you know.

Today marks a major moment for child health: the AAP has released its updated 2026 childhood and adolescent immunization schedule. Updated annually to reflect the latest scientific evidence, this year’s schedule is formally endorsed by 12 leading medical and healthcare organizations.
bit.ly/4r5KbaQ

IANAL, but the efforts by DHS to cover for these killers (e.g. the obvious lies about brandishing the weapon) sure seem to be a crime of their own. I hope Minnesota is able to get a hold of people to prosecute for their participation in this.

www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cit...

@pocan.house.gov Reporting says DHS and DOJ are covering up for the murder in Minnesota yesterday. If this is the case I expect hearings up to and including impeachment of leadership of those departments and agencies.

Abolish ICE.
For Good.

When people criticize politically expedient fraud and then say proven fraud is OK it's clear their problem isn't with the fraud. It's with the convenient target.

That's what this person is doing by boosting Trump's framing of fraud in Minnesota while ignoring Trump's pardons of Medicaid fraudsters.

He's calling negative stories about his obvious deterioration treasonous. Somehow his assaults on the First Amendment continue to increase.

You call them "toast tongs" but I swear they're really meant for quackers.

I knew many Republicans were doing it for the fringe benefits, not actually believing what they say. But it's still shocking to see so many line up with the idea that a government law enforcement group can just round people up without reasonable suspicion.

I'm sorry, I got riled up like on Twitter.

I can believe you meant that and I joined after it had escalated. Please understand that many of those who thought you meant Democrats did so in good faith. Further litigation of that isn't worthy of either of our time.

Have a lovely evening!

Fair criticism of my language choice. I should have said is it didn't come with blatant misrepresentations of the criticism. Thank you for the opportunity to correct my improper implications.

There's no sign or claim you feared to say "Democrats." That leads me to doubt your earnestness elsewhere.

Yes.

You have since said that's not what you meant. Which, if you did it without all the vitriol, would be great and make sense. But here it seems like backpeddling.

Not in colloquial American language, which is what I'm assuming you're using on this platform.

Put a different way, you ask why you'd go to such lengths to obscure mentions of Democrats. You didn't. It may have been unintentional, but you used language that heavily implies them. Then gaslit us.

You call it bipartisan. In this country, when we're talking about policy, that is equivalent to "Republicans and Democrats" unless there are other parties mentioned.

By "bipartisan" did you mean Republicans and Libertarians? Which "liberals" did you mean in your other post?

That's not weird.

Now that our Supreme Court has declined to block Musk's self-descrobed violation of state vote buying laws, I hope @joshkaulwi.bsky.social is moving forward with felony charges, whatever the outcome of tomorrow's election may be.

I didn't rewatch or anything, but how did he know both sides of the switch were kind of the same color?

That said, I thought the bank robbery was a lot of fun. I'm seeing it as a bonus episode on top of an eight episode season.

#Daredevil