Briefly, a mixed monitoring scenario works well, which is realistic for many agencies. It is ok to monitor a subset of populations. And monitoring 50 to 300 species per country, for a country level estimate, depending on species richness. Indicator works for declining and recovering populations.

We assert that a better understanding of the policy context is vital for researchers to tailor their work to help meet commitments to conserving biodiversity. @coalitioncongen.bsky.social @gbike.bsky.social @testeeves.bsky.social @scbnorthamerica.bsky.social

We address (a) the KMGBF's terminology and scope, (b) the intersection of KMGBF targets with genetic diversity, (c) genetic monitoring for tracking progress, (d) decision frameworks to guide genetic conservation actions, and (e) emerging frontiers.

Yes I think the worst

Thanks! This makes sense to me. It would be nice to fix in the future if possible. But I understand. I do appreciate the great responsiveness! Thanks, I think @en.blueark.app is a great service!

Hello @en.blueark.app is it still the case that you cannot update the dates on the posts? I just used blueark to migrate all my tweets from the other place, and my tweets from the past decade are in the right order, but not with the original date. Can you fix the date posted?

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29042025/trump-terminates-usgs-water-data-center-leases-threatening-flood-management/

https://wildlife.org/usgs-cuts-would-jeopardize-leading-wildlife-research/

comment on proposal here https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/04/17/2025-06746/rescinding-the-definition-of-harm-under-the-endangered-species-act. Hope my comments help guide yours! @ESA_org @Society4ConBio

https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member