Scott Product
@scottproduct.bsky.social
Based Marxist Super Jesus
Which, if you're a thin skinned cry bully, is a devastating admission to make
November 22, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Which, if you're a thin skinned cry bully, is a devastating admission to make
I think it stems from a need to characterise criticism of people like Glinner as originating from a small group of individuals running sock accounts.
The truth is, he's almost universally hated outside of a small group of people running sock accounts.
The truth is, he's almost universally hated outside of a small group of people running sock accounts.
November 22, 2025 at 8:42 AM
I think it stems from a need to characterise criticism of people like Glinner as originating from a small group of individuals running sock accounts.
The truth is, he's almost universally hated outside of a small group of people running sock accounts.
The truth is, he's almost universally hated outside of a small group of people running sock accounts.
Hey Alan, am I you?
I've got an incel maniac on Elon's shit site of hatred telling me that I am.
Thought I'd check
I've got an incel maniac on Elon's shit site of hatred telling me that I am.
Thought I'd check
November 21, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Hey Alan, am I you?
I've got an incel maniac on Elon's shit site of hatred telling me that I am.
Thought I'd check
I've got an incel maniac on Elon's shit site of hatred telling me that I am.
Thought I'd check
Yep, and at the same as doubling down on the defamation of Paisley.
I’m sure his solicitors are super happy about all of this
I’m sure his solicitors are super happy about all of this
February 26, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Yep, and at the same as doubling down on the defamation of Paisley.
I’m sure his solicitors are super happy about all of this
I’m sure his solicitors are super happy about all of this
It’s amazing, the worst people always turn out to be the worse people
February 26, 2025 at 1:16 PM
It’s amazing, the worst people always turn out to be the worse people
He’s threatening to release a “400 page dossier” he and others have compiled on the individual.
Which is an amazing considering he’s in the middle of legal action and trying to defend himself against accusations of online harassment
Which is an amazing considering he’s in the middle of legal action and trying to defend himself against accusations of online harassment
February 25, 2025 at 3:19 PM
He’s threatening to release a “400 page dossier” he and others have compiled on the individual.
Which is an amazing considering he’s in the middle of legal action and trying to defend himself against accusations of online harassment
Which is an amazing considering he’s in the middle of legal action and trying to defend himself against accusations of online harassment
You act like you're surprised :D
February 25, 2025 at 2:58 PM
You act like you're surprised :D
Kind of like the Nazi’s rejecting special and general relativity because it was Jüdische Physik”
February 7, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Kind of like the Nazi’s rejecting special and general relativity because it was Jüdische Physik”
This is just republishing some of the original claims, isn't it?
That cost Barton a LOT of money. He paid £75k + legal costs and apologised for the initial defamation and subsequently had to pay another £35k for repeating after Vine too legal action
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
That cost Barton a LOT of money. He paid £75k + legal costs and apologised for the initial defamation and subsequently had to pay another £35k for repeating after Vine too legal action
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Joey Barton to pay an extra £35,000 to Jeremy Vine
The ex-footballer had already agreed to pay £75,000 over a series of defamatory social media posts.
www.bbc.co.uk
February 7, 2025 at 8:23 AM
This is just republishing some of the original claims, isn't it?
That cost Barton a LOT of money. He paid £75k + legal costs and apologised for the initial defamation and subsequently had to pay another £35k for repeating after Vine too legal action
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
That cost Barton a LOT of money. He paid £75k + legal costs and apologised for the initial defamation and subsequently had to pay another £35k for repeating after Vine too legal action
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Glinner's barrister is estimating 18 months
It's weird that he'd say calling someone a nonce is a triviality (ask Joey Barton or Lozza Fox), especially given his legal team vigorously fought against it being defamatory.
It's weird that he'd say calling someone a nonce is a triviality (ask Joey Barton or Lozza Fox), especially given his legal team vigorously fought against it being defamatory.
February 7, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Glinner's barrister is estimating 18 months
It's weird that he'd say calling someone a nonce is a triviality (ask Joey Barton or Lozza Fox), especially given his legal team vigorously fought against it being defamatory.
It's weird that he'd say calling someone a nonce is a triviality (ask Joey Barton or Lozza Fox), especially given his legal team vigorously fought against it being defamatory.
So there are a lot of steps remaining, and some of what I've said is almost definitely incomplete or wrong because I'm not a lawyer
February 7, 2025 at 7:57 AM
So there are a lot of steps remaining, and some of what I've said is almost definitely incomplete or wrong because I'm not a lawyer
Glinner's will have to submit another defence taking into account the prelim issues rulings. After that, there'll be further disclosure of documents and evidence, exchange of witness statements and pre-trial reviews to ensure all issues have been identified and narrowed.
February 7, 2025 at 7:56 AM
Glinner's will have to submit another defence taking into account the prelim issues rulings. After that, there'll be further disclosure of documents and evidence, exchange of witness statements and pre-trial reviews to ensure all issues have been identified and narrowed.
It looks like preliminary issues are settled now.
The judge has asked the parties to agree on a timetable for written submissions on who bears costs for the preliminary issues trials. He said he suspects this will lead to another hearing
The judge has asked the parties to agree on a timetable for written submissions on who bears costs for the preliminary issues trials. He said he suspects this will lead to another hearing
February 7, 2025 at 7:53 AM
It looks like preliminary issues are settled now.
The judge has asked the parties to agree on a timetable for written submissions on who bears costs for the preliminary issues trials. He said he suspects this will lead to another hearing
The judge has asked the parties to agree on a timetable for written submissions on who bears costs for the preliminary issues trials. He said he suspects this will lead to another hearing
Don't forget his essential work on PUMP DEPOUNDING
February 6, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Don't forget his essential work on PUMP DEPOUNDING
What the what now? Is this verifiably true?
February 6, 2025 at 7:39 AM
What the what now? Is this verifiably true?
And so everyone is clear, these are the 11 defamatory statements and their meaning that Graham must defend.
Underlined text is deemed a statement of opinion, while the rest are statements of fact.
Underlined text is deemed a statement of opinion, while the rest are statements of fact.
February 6, 2025 at 7:15 AM
And so everyone is clear, these are the 11 defamatory statements and their meaning that Graham must defend.
Underlined text is deemed a statement of opinion, while the rest are statements of fact.
Underlined text is deemed a statement of opinion, while the rest are statements of fact.
Hey David! Congratulations on this and the previous win. It's incredible how much court time was spent deciding whether "nonce" was defamatory.
I hope he's held to account for his actions in court, and if the only way forward is a settlement, it's accompanied by a full apology for his actions.
I hope he's held to account for his actions in court, and if the only way forward is a settlement, it's accompanied by a full apology for his actions.
February 6, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Hey David! Congratulations on this and the previous win. It's incredible how much court time was spent deciding whether "nonce" was defamatory.
I hope he's held to account for his actions in court, and if the only way forward is a settlement, it's accompanied by a full apology for his actions.
I hope he's held to account for his actions in court, and if the only way forward is a settlement, it's accompanied by a full apology for his actions.
hey Graham, do you have a court date for your defamation trial?
Irrespective of who wins it’ll be amazing seeing your incredibly poor behaviour pored over for everyone to see in excruciating detail. Are you planning on giving evidence?
Irrespective of who wins it’ll be amazing seeing your incredibly poor behaviour pored over for everyone to see in excruciating detail. Are you planning on giving evidence?
December 11, 2024 at 9:43 AM
hey Graham, do you have a court date for your defamation trial?
Irrespective of who wins it’ll be amazing seeing your incredibly poor behaviour pored over for everyone to see in excruciating detail. Are you planning on giving evidence?
Irrespective of who wins it’ll be amazing seeing your incredibly poor behaviour pored over for everyone to see in excruciating detail. Are you planning on giving evidence?
I can't get on with Frank Herbert's Dune series, I read the first one and didn't get anything of value from it. Love the Villneuve films and even the David Lynch interpretation (to an extent) but it just seemed like schlocky sci-fi. I think this is a me problem :D
November 28, 2024 at 7:25 AM
I can't get on with Frank Herbert's Dune series, I read the first one and didn't get anything of value from it. Love the Villneuve films and even the David Lynch interpretation (to an extent) but it just seemed like schlocky sci-fi. I think this is a me problem :D