Whiskas O’Brien
@scmods.bsky.social
Well, he’s right, it’s certainly not a debate
November 8, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Well, he’s right, it’s certainly not a debate
Every cop I know would LOVE to see teams of “experts” out there at 3:00 in the morning dealing with this stuff. Sadly, the experts are strictly office hours only.
November 4, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Every cop I know would LOVE to see teams of “experts” out there at 3:00 in the morning dealing with this stuff. Sadly, the experts are strictly office hours only.
You missed *umpires miscounting the number of runs scored off that ball
November 4, 2025 at 3:54 AM
You missed *umpires miscounting the number of runs scored off that ball
Only four teams in 1916, so I guess either everybody met again the following week, or nobody did
November 3, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Only four teams in 1916, so I guess either everybody met again the following week, or nobody did
I’m on my way
I’m on my way to podcast today
I’m on my way to podcast today
November 3, 2025 at 4:41 AM
I’m on my way
I’m on my way to podcast today
I’m on my way to podcast today
Wasn’t he one of the ones who spent the previous six months criticising Albo for NOT having met with Trump yet?
November 3, 2025 at 4:37 AM
Wasn’t he one of the ones who spent the previous six months criticising Albo for NOT having met with Trump yet?
It means that in any given week, the team that was at that point sitting in 18th won more often than the team sitting in fourth.
November 2, 2025 at 5:30 AM
It means that in any given week, the team that was at that point sitting in 18th won more often than the team sitting in fourth.
I have seen the footage, and I am not chilled.
October 30, 2025 at 4:53 AM
I have seen the footage, and I am not chilled.
“Man with huge financial stake in the IPL believes every other competition should be an off-shoot of the IPL”
October 25, 2025 at 12:13 AM
“Man with huge financial stake in the IPL believes every other competition should be an off-shoot of the IPL”
I remember watching that when it happened. Sort of feels like it should be out, but it’s not and that’s that.
October 23, 2025 at 4:55 AM
I remember watching that when it happened. Sort of feels like it should be out, but it’s not and that’s that.
From the organisation that brought you the “boundary count” tiebreaker.
October 22, 2025 at 5:03 AM
From the organisation that brought you the “boundary count” tiebreaker.
No. But you can fuck off any time you like.
October 21, 2025 at 5:01 AM
No. But you can fuck off any time you like.
I read that as “bathroom” first time through. Which wouldn’t have surprised me either, to be honest.
October 21, 2025 at 4:59 AM
I read that as “bathroom” first time through. Which wouldn’t have surprised me either, to be honest.
Dale said it better
October 17, 2025 at 4:53 AM
Dale said it better
Now we can move on to the 2025 election, where he did it again
October 9, 2025 at 5:08 AM
Now we can move on to the 2025 election, where he did it again
You, sir, are a fucking maniac
October 9, 2025 at 5:01 AM
You, sir, are a fucking maniac
No, it’s JUST OUTSIDE the atmosphere and everyone knows our eyes can’t see that far
October 7, 2025 at 4:54 AM
No, it’s JUST OUTSIDE the atmosphere and everyone knows our eyes can’t see that far
Well, sort of… if you go out and look at the moon at the same time each night you will see it further east each time. But it got there by going west while you weren’t watching.
October 7, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Well, sort of… if you go out and look at the moon at the same time each night you will see it further east each time. But it got there by going west while you weren’t watching.
No, not the mind probe
October 5, 2025 at 12:10 AM
No, not the mind probe
October 3, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Not true, at least where I live. The offence is committed when the property is moved with the intent to steal it. Exiting the building is just the easy way to prove the intent.
October 2, 2025 at 4:41 AM
Not true, at least where I live. The offence is committed when the property is moved with the intent to steal it. Exiting the building is just the easy way to prove the intent.
“Who’s that guy?”
“What did that guy say while I was saying who’s that guy?”
“What did that guy say while I was saying who’s that guy?”
September 30, 2025 at 4:40 AM
“Who’s that guy?”
“What did that guy say while I was saying who’s that guy?”
“What did that guy say while I was saying who’s that guy?”
Better get them some more priority access to draft young talent
September 29, 2025 at 4:32 AM
Better get them some more priority access to draft young talent
I want to ask Jen to name the four fathers
September 26, 2025 at 4:26 AM
I want to ask Jen to name the four fathers