‼️

11/ The chapter’s outlook is methodological: Reading Hegel through the Black intellectual tradition does double work: it exposes how recognition theory could legitimate slavery, and it brings into view resources for liberation that the master–slave frame systematically misses.

10/ Their later work supplies the missing piece.
Agency grows out of horizontal recognition: communal life, shared practices, and mutual support among the oppressed themselves.

9/ Despite their different approaches, both thinkers nonetheless confront the a similar Hegelian problem – what Melvin Rogers calls the paradox of recognition:
If recognition is denied all the way down – if domination hollows out agency – how can the oppressed resist at all?

8/ Davis, reading Frederick Douglass, pushes in a different direction. Building on Hegel, she transforms liberty from a static status into liberation as struggle: insight doesn’t arise through servitude, but through active, even violent resistance.

7/ Accordingly, Fanon’s target isn’t recognition as such, but its one-sided distribution under colonialism – the coloniser’s exclusive authority to recognise, including the power to grant, limit, or withdraw recognition at will, even when it is formally “granted”.

6/ Fanon restarts the dialectic from a different beginning.
Where Hegel’s subjects seek recognition of their absolute value through a life-and-death struggle, Fanon starts from affirmation – “Yes to life, yes to love, yes to generosity” – and an orientation toward mutual recognition from the outset.

5/ This is the backdrop against which Frantz Fanon and Angela Davis return to the dialectic of lordship and bondage. Crucially, they don’t abandon the dialectic – instead, they rework it against its pro-slavery use in Hegel.

4/ This amounts to a partial justification of slavery: forced labour functions as “Bildung” for freedom & full personhood is withheld until the enslaved have become sufficiently “gebildet”. Hegel thus presents racial domination as a necessary step in the spiritual development of Africans.

3/ In the Philosophy of Right, Hegel explicitly links the dialectic to slavery and later mobilises it to defend “slow” manumission of transatlantic slavery: slavery is wrong in principle, yet allegedly necessary to “tame” and “educate” enslaved Africans for freedom.

2/ The chapter begins from a familiar assumption: Hegel’s dialectic of lordship and bondage is often read as abstract – emancipatory, even. But when you follow its later use in Hegel’s mature work, in dialogue with the British abolition debate around Thomas Clarkson, that picture starts to crack.

Hatte gerade eine interessante Diskussion über die Verwendung des Wortes "Rasse" – insbesondere in Verbindung mit der ebenfalls mehrdeutigen "Frage der anthropologischen Differenzen" – und darüber, ob die vielen sonstigen Kontextmarker auf dem Poster die problematische Deutung ausschließen.