That’s a difficult question to answer, primarily because all of western intelligence is designed around our sharing programs. We fill in each other’s weaknesses quite well. If the US forbids our allies to share US intelligence with Ukraine, that will make it more complicated, but not impossible.

I’m skeptical. They might have an IDEA of who was on the boats, but I’ve seen nothing to suggest that they have positively IDed these targets. They would likely be gloating about it if they had.

I think Patel is probably first, but Hegseth could take the spot - Trump is getting really sick of the negative coverage for both of them.

Yes. Imagine if this were Hunter Biden. That’s all you need to know about how badly this is being mishandled right now.

Could they? Sure. Will they? Absolutely not.

What they’ve described here is murder. Full stop. We don’t deny aid, and we don’t execute people who are trying to surrender.

It should make EVERYONE nauseous.

But yes, this story is falling apart.

I would trust a daycare run by Casey Anthony and a deep water excursion with OceanGate more than anything Kash Patel says.

I think that map is going to end up backfiring on Texas. They’ve given up some bright red districts in hopes of gaining more red-ish ones.

In a high turnout election, a lot of those seats could very well turn blue.

I’m curious to see what evidence they have. Also interesting that it turned out to be an election denier - go figure

I mean, it’s literally in the constitution, so it should be the easiest thing they’ve ever ruled on.

But yeah, they’ll probably get rid of it.

As far as I know, they haven’t started the official process of withdrawing from NATO yet.

And based on that reporting, the US just says they won’t be the “primary conventional defense provider” - I’d be shocked if this isn’t scrapped before anything happens.

Nope. It’s pretty fucked, and they’re acting like it’s a good thing 🤦‍♂️