"Rich kids are getting disability accommodation because they were born in a zip code with a tax base that can fund public schools with holistic support systems". The disabilities are 100% real, the level of support is reliant on how flush your school is which is income dependent like everything else

The history of white people?

You know we would want you any other waaay!

I mean, capitalism isn't the only reason hybrid crops are developed. Sometimes the "heritage" one kept dying or not producing enough yield to stave off starvation. Love me some GMOs!

Oh, but Daddy dom isn't "incest fantasy"? Because that's a over pornhub 🙄🙄🙄

I guess the actual point is that there are some guidelines for helping you guess whether something will hit a nerve, but they're extremely subjective so at the end of the day it's not unethical to just...keep on doing what your doing.

Honestly my only personal lines are 9/11 and the Challenger disaster because both of them were watched in real-time by a staggering % of the population. The trauma is universal in a way that sat, the JFK assassination isn't. Of course tons of people will use humor to process and these traumas.

3. Were all the victims rich fucking shit heads who huberis'd themselves into it? Titan: Yes (fair. game.) EF: no
4. Are they generational traumas? EF: not really (again, showing up in the "fair game" category", 9/11: yes (see point 2, as well, though I guess the US gets to tone-set this time.)

2. Is it intentional? Edmund Fitzgerald: no (note this is a counter point to #1), Hiroshima/ Nagasaki: yes (though your point of how the Japanese relate to this is thought provoking. Seems fair they should get to set the tone on these)

Here are my lines, for reference, I promise I don't think they are the *right* lines. Just examples, since you kinda asked.
1. Are victims or victims children still alive? Great Chicago Fire: no, Edmund Fitzgerald: yes. I'm 40, my Dad is 71. He could have been in school with someone on EF.