Sara Reardon
@sarareardon.bsky.social
Science journalist covering all things wild and wonderful. '25-26 Knight Science Journalism fellow. Alum @science.org, @Nature.com, @NewScientist.com
🧠 🧬 ⚖️ 🐒 🏳️🌈 🦠 🔬 🏛 👩🔬
Signal: sara_reardon.59
🧠 🧬 ⚖️ 🐒 🏳️🌈 🦠 🔬 🏛 👩🔬
Signal: sara_reardon.59
Never had to write [sic] that many times
April 25, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Never had to write [sic] that many times
They cite a statute that says they can legally cancel grants that "no longer effectuate program goals or agency priorities," which aren't all that well defined. Here's an example of a letter. bsky.app/profile/davi...
1/9 In recent grant terminations, you might have seen vague justifications about “no longer effectuates agency priorities” (NIH example below).
Where did that language come from and what does it mean?
BUCKLE UP for a wild ride starting from **8 years ago** 🧵
Where did that language come from and what does it mean?
BUCKLE UP for a wild ride starting from **8 years ago** 🧵
March 24, 2025 at 2:27 PM
They cite a statute that says they can legally cancel grants that "no longer effectuate program goals or agency priorities," which aren't all that well defined. Here's an example of a letter. bsky.app/profile/davi...