Sarah Rankin
@sarahrankin.bsky.social
I'm really big into all the snacks. YEG born. UofT Law grad. Calgary criminal lawyer. She/her. Views are my own.
Headlight brightness has doubled in the US in the last decade
It’s definitely not just angle or perception
www.theringer.com/2024/12/03/t...
It’s definitely not just angle or perception
www.theringer.com/2024/12/03/t...
Asleep at the Wheel in the Headlight Brightness Wars
The crusade against bright headlights has picked up speed in recent years, in large part due to a couple of Reddit nerds. Could they know what’s best for the auto industry better than the auto industr...
www.theringer.com
November 25, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Headlight brightness has doubled in the US in the last decade
It’s definitely not just angle or perception
www.theringer.com/2024/12/03/t...
It’s definitely not just angle or perception
www.theringer.com/2024/12/03/t...
Reposted by Sarah Rankin
“We don’t deserve the trust of the nation if we’re unclear about the divisiveness of swastikas.” — that anonymous Coast Guard official
November 21, 2025 at 1:49 PM
“We don’t deserve the trust of the nation if we’re unclear about the divisiveness of swastikas.” — that anonymous Coast Guard official
is nothing unusual about this decision. What is unusual is the vitriol from other branches of government, and it's dangerous. They don't have to agree. They can be critical. But what happened after this decision is something new in the last ~15 years, and that is worth talking about.
November 10, 2025 at 9:32 PM
is nothing unusual about this decision. What is unusual is the vitriol from other branches of government, and it's dangerous. They don't have to agree. They can be critical. But what happened after this decision is something new in the last ~15 years, and that is worth talking about.
didn't just speak aggressively, he endorsed executions. Poilievre &others contributed to active miseducation about the ruling, its meaning, and the Court. There are reasonable people on both sides of the convo about reasonable hypotheticals but that's a different thing than attacking a court. There
November 10, 2025 at 9:32 PM
didn't just speak aggressively, he endorsed executions. Poilievre &others contributed to active miseducation about the ruling, its meaning, and the Court. There are reasonable people on both sides of the convo about reasonable hypotheticals but that's a different thing than attacking a court. There
I mean not quite enough to get the charge right but it’s the sentiment that really matters
November 6, 2025 at 4:54 PM
I mean not quite enough to get the charge right but it’s the sentiment that really matters
Took care of that cigarette butt tho!
November 6, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Took care of that cigarette butt tho!