Cool stuff! Love seeing more frameworks exploring RSCs.

How does this example work – I thought it was a fundamental part of the design of RSCs that client components can't import server components?

Giving the docs for the awesome experimental <Activity> component a once-over this morning 💅

🤔

This should be the hello world of RSC!

I loved it. Feels like it could generalize to trees too

"Stores want normalized data, but screens want graphs"

Loved this phrasing from this instantdb essay. Lots of overlap regardless if you're local-firsting or not: www.instantdb.com/essays/next_...

At this part right now, and immediately SQL came to mind. The SQL query is another blueprint, prepared by the first computer but sent to the DB server at request time for interpretation. Its results are closed over by the first computer as it assembles the blueprint for the second computer.

This is wonderful. From Lane 8’s newest mixtape.

It’s so frustrating that true constraint-based layouts seem impossible

I reallyyyyy miss `import * as Dialog from ''` and <Dialog.Root>, <Dialog.Content> imports when working in RSC 😢 Both LOC and discoverability benefits.

Any idea if there's a future for namespace imports in RSC?

Just updated my Mac Dock demo with transform-only animations, a smoother container, and bouncy app icons!

buildui.com/recipes/magn...

Ah good to know!

Looks like the lib I mentioned (use-stick-to-bottom) handles it well, I would definitely use that in a prod project!

Came across this nice auto-scroller library recently:

github.com/stackblitz/u...

Was fun seeing it work with a useAnimatedText hook I wrote recently! Easy to tweak the spring values to change the vibe.

I don't think "going from static to dynamic" should even be in the vernacular, I think the app should be dynamic from the start since that's what's needed to "make it work". As an example here's how far down the Rails guides the concept of caching is introduced.