řüĺĕņ
banner
rulen613.bsky.social
řüĺĕņ
@rulen613.bsky.social
Angeli Rose Gomez for Texas Senator

She ran thru cops into Uvaldi to save her children. She picks crops as her livelihood.

She can speak for Texas starting on Nov 3rd, 2026.
If you are a prosecutor with a potential charge on one of them, and the statute of limitations ran out on, say, 1 Feb 2029...

What would you do with it right now?
November 30, 2025 at 7:00 PM
I disagree...I suspect there will be done for whom it's possible. Not all. But for those whom it is, get 'em.
November 30, 2025 at 6:19 PM
In which case, try them for something left out of the pardon letter.

Make the point.
November 30, 2025 at 5:38 PM
So... the courts-martials need to be carefully prepped, taking about 18 months. And carefully tried, starting with the most senior person, easily another 3 months to empanel the jury, 6 months discovery, 10 months trial....oops, no more pardons by Trump. Unless pre-emptive.
November 30, 2025 at 5:38 PM
The "department of war" makes him the "secretary of war" or SOW.

Which is the correct term for a pig that's got piglets.
November 30, 2025 at 2:40 AM
I love what you did to the elf.
November 30, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Reposted by řüĺĕņ
“Even if the U.S. were at war with the traffickers, an order to kill all the boat’s occupants if they were no longer able to fight “would in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime,” said Huntley, now director of the national security law program at Georgetown Law.”
November 29, 2025 at 3:08 AM
🫡
November 29, 2025 at 2:41 AM
AI slop.

There are real examples worth celebrating instead.
November 28, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Ok, the life you have is bad.

And your response to the next guy is trollish.

I wasn't trying to 'scare' you, I was trying to get you to see your argument applied to things you care about, since you don't respect authors or artists' things.

But I'm done with you now-go bother a librarian.
November 28, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Theft is theft.
November 28, 2025 at 2:20 PM
You're looking for pre-historical tribes.

They wern't anti-ownership, the concept hadn't occured to them yet.
November 28, 2025 at 2:19 PM
If you want such a society, I'm sure there's a charity in your area happy to take all your things, including the phone you post with.

But as that would work out poorly for you, I don't recommend it. I do recommend more time thinking about things, and less time mangling somebody else's theories.
November 28, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Yes, that's the point of possessions. It is a thing of which the use is controlled by the possessor.

You are arguing for a society without possessions.

Such societies tend to be very much subsistance level, no tech, and evolve into feudal tyrannies given time and environmental hardship.
November 28, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Agreed. They're most likely a 14 yr old who stumbled into a marxist reddit or some such and now thinks they know things...

Dunning-kruger in skeet form.
November 28, 2025 at 5:44 AM
I watched every second. Slow travel is where it's at, if you can manage it.

I need every update!
November 28, 2025 at 1:46 AM