Romany Webb
@romany-webb.bsky.social
Deputy Director, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Working on climate, energy, carbon removal, methane removal, and more.
(4) When conducting environmental assessments for individual mCDR projects, parties must analyze the projects’ climate mitigation benefits alongside their potential environmental harms. (6/6)
August 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
(4) When conducting environmental assessments for individual mCDR projects, parties must analyze the projects’ climate mitigation benefits alongside their potential environmental harms. (6/6)
(3) Parties must, in accordance with their due diligence obligations, actively pursue scientific information to enable them to assess the availability of mCDR to mitigate climate change. (5/6)
August 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
(3) Parties must, in accordance with their due diligence obligations, actively pursue scientific information to enable them to assess the availability of mCDR to mitigate climate change. (5/6)
(1) Parties must apply the precautionary approach in a way that does not unduly delay climate mitigation action. (2) Parties must apply the prevention principle alongside precaution and, to this end, consider the potential for regulation to aid in preventing transboundary climate-related harm. (4/6)
August 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
(1) Parties must apply the precautionary approach in a way that does not unduly delay climate mitigation action. (2) Parties must apply the prevention principle alongside precaution and, to this end, consider the potential for regulation to aid in preventing transboundary climate-related harm. (4/6)