Fantastic! This could be useful for making figures for a paper we're preparing. If so, would it be OK for us to use your tool and cite it?

As always, the ISEEC Conference will embrace comparative oncology, transmissible cancers, and all other aspects of cancer evolution and ecology. This edition will also focus on human–tech cooperation for the evolutionary management of cancer, in collaboration with the Cooperative Futures Institute.

I now see you already have a "Node dots" option. My suggestion would be extend this by allowing the user to set the size of each individual node. But the tool is already very useful as it is. Thank you!

Very nice! If I were to suggest an enhancement, it would be an option to draw nodes (internal nodes and leaves) as discs with variable sizes. I've been unable to find any software that plots trees with both variable branch lengths and variable node sizes. But node sizes don't fit in Newick format.

On yesterday's run I also saw wild boar www.strava.com/activities/1...

I'd consider doing this to learn more about what the journals are looking for. This could help me improve my submissions.

I hear it's a good package (though someone should get round to fixing the deprecated dplyr verbs)

Sometimes people instead call them fish plots

It says something that the UK is functionally more anti-COVID-vax even than Florida

Good question! If you have basic health insurance here (as nearly all permanent residents do) then it costs nothing

I guess I shoud wait for the preprint!

Also there's no standard definition of oncology. It can include only diagnosis and treatment (e.g. according to the NCI) or "the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and study of cancer" (e.g. Merriam Webster). Why exclude diagnosis and prevention?

On second thought, I think I see where he's coming from: mathematical oncology is not the same as mathematical cancer research; the former is a subset of the latter. That's consistent with the definition of oncology. But it risks excluding some mathematical cancer researchers from the community.

Sorry to miss this one as the taxi was waiting. That definition seems rather narrow! Is there a related preprint?

Sarah Brüningk explains that "agent-based model" has very different meanings in mathematical biology and AI. Perhaps we can combine the two model types? #MathOnco25