Read the full article here 👉 www.freedomfoodalliance.org/unfork-the-f...

thanks so much Adam!

The US technology company said on Tuesday, just before it reported lower-than-forecast earnings, that it had updated its ethical guidelines around AI, & they no longer referred to not pursuing technologies that could “cause or are likely to cause overall harm”.

What happened to “do no evil” Google?

🌱 Let’s debunk this anti-plant nonsense. https://www.foodfacts.org/articles/plants-good-why-wellness-influencers-call-them-toxic

This won’t end well—for Meta or for society.

p.s can we all take a moment to appreciate the $900,000 watch on his wrist.

#smalldickenergy #billionaresgonnabillion

This isn’t about fostering open dialogue; it’s about passing the buck. And it’s a decision that risks amplifying harm at a time when platforms like Meta should be leading the charge against disinformation.

The World Economic Forum has identified the spread of misinformation as the top global threat to humanity, even surpassing extreme weather events.

By abandoning independent fact-checkers, Meta is shirking its responsibility to mitigate this critical issue.

This move is not a step toward empowering the public or expanding free speech. It’s a transparent attempt to offload the responsibility of managing misinformation onto the very users already overwhelmed by it.

Let’s be clear: free speech does not equate to enabling hate speech without accountability or consequence. Allowing harmful rhetoric to proliferate unchecked erodes trust, fuels division, and undermines the very fabric of informed public discourse.