Yessssss

my early take on part 4: not every album can be a banger, but i think folks will look back on it like the beatles' revolver. some decent hits but overlooked by other greater works

imagine bein izzy out here drawing nude portraits then gettin your phone blown up over this droppin

lmao

brother, i've covered them for the better part of a decade

yea that's exactly what our story did

deeeeeep cut

nah dont

tfw you aren't a billioinaire so you have to do a gofundme for your powertrip 🥺

Based on our analysis, Sacks kept 449 stakes in AI-related co's. Of those, 438 stakes were classified as SaaS or hardware, despite having AI connections. Those co's could benefit as Sacks continues to influence US AI policy.

Read more in the full story here: www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/t...

Sacks also kept his stake in Glue, "an AI-assisted chat platform," that he *cofounded*. His waiver designated Glue as a SaaS company.

Sacks has openly promoted Glue as a Slack-killer and he still sits on the company's board. Here is Glue's website: glue.ai

Sacks also has a direct investment in Tesla, which represents more than 1.6% of his total assets, and is designated as "hardware." He kept this stake.

Tesla undoubtedly makes cars and hardware. But, Elon Musk has openly described the company as an AI and robotics company since at least last year.

One investment designated as "SaaS" — and not AI — was Palantir. It represents one of Sacks' largest investments, representing more than 1.8% of his total assets. He held onto his Palantir stake.

On the right is the first message that greets someone visiting Palantir's website.

We looked at every one of these companies listed as SaaS (aka software as a service) or hardware. It's unclear why they were delineated separate of Sacks' AI stakes, but he kept all these investments.

Some of these "SaaS" companies literally had AI in their names: Freeplay AI, Advocate AI, etc.