Ulrike Franke
banner
rikefranke.bsky.social
Ulrike Franke
@rikefranke.bsky.social
Senior Fellow at European Council on Foreign Relations. #Drone politics PhD @ox.ac.uk. Previously at, and now teaching @SciencesPo.bsky.social. Writes about all things #Germany #Defence #miltech. Podcast host at @SicherheitsPod.de & LeCollimateur
Thanks for correcting the typo 😅
December 5, 2025 at 2:45 PM
last *night*/yesterday evening.
December 5, 2025 at 12:23 PM
There is one striking incoherence in the text: the document is all about America first.

But the very same document lists America’s “network of alliances” & “unmatched softpower” as assets, and speaks about “collective defence”.
If the US does what it describes in the doc, it will lose all that.
December 5, 2025 at 11:41 AM
I very clearly say my point is about form not content. And yet

bsky.app/profile/rike...
Just compare the table of content from the 2025 to the 2022 NSS.
Prioritisation and easy language.
Honestly, our strategies could use more of that.

(This is a point about form, not content.)
December 5, 2025 at 11:36 AM
And if you are so inclined, you can compare and contrast to the last NSS from 2022. Different times.

bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/u...
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov
December 5, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Link to the full strategy again:

www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/u...
www.whitehouse.gov
December 5, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Just realised I made exactly this point not too long ago in a Collimateur debate: if the US wants to become more like other countries, it will lose some of the exceptional advantages that come from being exceptional. I don’t think the people in power are really taking that into consideration. 👇
Car en effet, comme le pointe @rikefranke.bsky.social, quand on décide de cesser d'être la puissance dominante de la planète pour arrêter de se prendre la tête et faire des économies, on sait certainement ce qu'on y gagne — mais visiblement moins ce qu'on y perd.

(en tout cas pour eux)
December 5, 2025 at 11:22 AM
There is a link at the beginning of the thread
December 5, 2025 at 11:18 AM
The doc is all about closing the US, yet it says that “openness” is what differentiates it internationally.
It wants to rebalance markets, criticises globalisation, yet says that “free market capitalism” will “continue to make us the global partner of first choice.”
December 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM
There is one striking incoherence in the text: the document is all about America first.

But the very same document lists America’s “network of alliances” & “unmatched softpower” as assets, and speaks about “collective defence”.
If the US does what it describes in the doc, it will lose all that.
December 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM
Activist in Europe. Elsewhere not so much.
December 5, 2025 at 11:05 AM
Reposted by Ulrike Franke
Let’s look at those priorities:

. “the affairs of other countries are our concern only if their activities directly threaten our interests”
. Focus on Western Hemisphere
. nations should prioritize their interests
. “days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over”
December 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Reposted by Ulrike Franke
I’ll go through it in order, but what all Europeans need to read are pages 25-27 on “Promoting European Greatness”.
December 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM
What struck me most on Europe wasn’t the focus on value, freedom of speech etc - again, very similar to Vance’s Munich speech - but how activist it is. This is about directly trying to influence what is going on in Europe:
December 5, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Pages 25 to 27 are most relevant here and should be read in their entirety
December 5, 2025 at 10:01 AM
What about Europe? It is mentioned quite a bit, with one primary focus: European identity and the alleged elites and minority governments that restrict core liberties and democratic processes. This is extremely close to JD Vance’s Munich speech.
December 5, 2025 at 9:59 AM
And domestically
December 5, 2025 at 9:54 AM
Let’s look at those priorities:

. “the affairs of other countries are our concern only if their activities directly threaten our interests”
. Focus on Western Hemisphere
. nations should prioritize their interests
. “days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over”
December 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Just compare the table of content from the 2025 to the 2022 NSS.
Prioritisation and easy language.
Honestly, our strategies could use more of that.

(This is a point about form, not content.)
December 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM
I’m also gonna say something that will be controversial here: This is actually a very accessible and easy to read document. Is it good prose? No, but it also doesn’t do jargon. It might be written by AI, as some have suggested, but for a normal person, this is much clearer than past strategies.
December 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM