David Riecks
@riecks.bsky.social
Photographer, writer, photo metadata consultant, project leader http://PhotoMetadata.org Owner: http://Controlledvocabulary.com
Reposted by David Riecks
Were this 17-point swing to occur uniformly in every Congressional district as now drawn, the result would be approximately 264 D seats, 171 R seats, a 51-seat shift. TX gerrymandering gains would be limited to 2 seats; NC/MO, backfire.
Not to say this will happen, just to illustrate the impact.
Not to say this will happen, just to illustrate the impact.
December 3, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Were this 17-point swing to occur uniformly in every Congressional district as now drawn, the result would be approximately 264 D seats, 171 R seats, a 51-seat shift. TX gerrymandering gains would be limited to 2 seats; NC/MO, backfire.
Not to say this will happen, just to illustrate the impact.
Not to say this will happen, just to illustrate the impact.
Reposted by David Riecks
It is fundamentally an excellent piece because it captures not just how bad the book is but the righteous rage so many of us feel about the depravity of these people, who do not deserve these positions of power, are not good writers or journalists, & cheapen everything that the rest of us try to do
December 3, 2025 at 2:31 AM
It is fundamentally an excellent piece because it captures not just how bad the book is but the righteous rage so many of us feel about the depravity of these people, who do not deserve these positions of power, are not good writers or journalists, & cheapen everything that the rest of us try to do
I thought Gutfeld was supposed to be the comic levity of the show? Is this supposed to be his idea of a joke? Sick!
December 3, 2025 at 2:50 AM
I thought Gutfeld was supposed to be the comic levity of the show? Is this supposed to be his idea of a joke? Sick!