@redadmin.bsky.social
Wait I thought you claimed he didn't retire in 2020. Now it was set years in advance? Even though it obviously wasn't.
www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/m...
www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/m...
Chris Matthews retires from MSNBC after string of recent controversies | CNN Business
Chris Matthews, one of America’s best-known political talk show hosts, is retiring from MSNBC, effective immediately, after a string of recent controversies on and off the air.
www.cnn.com
February 16, 2026 at 4:47 AM
Wait I thought you claimed he didn't retire in 2020. Now it was set years in advance? Even though it obviously wasn't.
www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/m...
www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/m...
So this is a thing that definitely happened with no real examples of this happening. More of a vibe then.
February 16, 2026 at 4:42 AM
So this is a thing that definitely happened with no real examples of this happening. More of a vibe then.
So where are these tweets?
Matthews retired March 2020 in disgrace. Why are you arguing searchable facts.
Matthews retired March 2020 in disgrace. Why are you arguing searchable facts.
February 16, 2026 at 4:29 AM
So where are these tweets?
Matthews retired March 2020 in disgrace. Why are you arguing searchable facts.
Matthews retired March 2020 in disgrace. Why are you arguing searchable facts.
If it was on twitter, obviously it was true as all things on there is real. All over but still no examples, huh?
Matthews who had to retire in 2020 for being senile, it was on Ruhles show but not from her, and some random guy who misspoke. None said they wouldn't vote for him if he won the primary?
Matthews who had to retire in 2020 for being senile, it was on Ruhles show but not from her, and some random guy who misspoke. None said they wouldn't vote for him if he won the primary?
February 16, 2026 at 4:17 AM
If it was on twitter, obviously it was true as all things on there is real. All over but still no examples, huh?
Matthews who had to retire in 2020 for being senile, it was on Ruhles show but not from her, and some random guy who misspoke. None said they wouldn't vote for him if he won the primary?
Matthews who had to retire in 2020 for being senile, it was on Ruhles show but not from her, and some random guy who misspoke. None said they wouldn't vote for him if he won the primary?
Liz Cheney was still on the Trump bandwagon in 2020.
Still not showing me democrats saying they wouldn't vote for Bernie in the general. Just republicans.
Still not showing me democrats saying they wouldn't vote for Bernie in the general. Just republicans.
February 16, 2026 at 3:05 AM
Liz Cheney was still on the Trump bandwagon in 2020.
Still not showing me democrats saying they wouldn't vote for Bernie in the general. Just republicans.
Still not showing me democrats saying they wouldn't vote for Bernie in the general. Just republicans.
People quoted in there is famous democrats Joe Scarborough, David Frum, and Jennifer Rubin.
Like wtf are we doing here...
Like wtf are we doing here...
February 16, 2026 at 2:52 AM
People quoted in there is famous democrats Joe Scarborough, David Frum, and Jennifer Rubin.
Like wtf are we doing here...
Like wtf are we doing here...
Or we could have been in his 3rd term right now
This totally could be an Atlantic or nyt think piece.
What would have saved us from Trump 2.0? A Trump 2020 win!
I hope Newsoms transphia sinks his career but this isn't going to do it.
This totally could be an Atlantic or nyt think piece.
What would have saved us from Trump 2.0? A Trump 2020 win!
I hope Newsoms transphia sinks his career but this isn't going to do it.
February 16, 2026 at 2:40 AM
Or we could have been in his 3rd term right now
This totally could be an Atlantic or nyt think piece.
What would have saved us from Trump 2.0? A Trump 2020 win!
I hope Newsoms transphia sinks his career but this isn't going to do it.
This totally could be an Atlantic or nyt think piece.
What would have saved us from Trump 2.0? A Trump 2020 win!
I hope Newsoms transphia sinks his career but this isn't going to do it.
It would have been better if Trump won is one hell of a take.
February 16, 2026 at 2:08 AM
It would have been better if Trump won is one hell of a take.
Wait, how are they saying they wouldn't vote for him? It was a worry others wouldn't not that they wouldn't in the general. Vote blue would have included him as well and anyone holding their vote wouldve gotten similar attacks
Like who is saying they wouldnt vote for the candidate if its not Newsom
Like who is saying they wouldnt vote for the candidate if its not Newsom
February 16, 2026 at 1:57 AM
Wait, how are they saying they wouldn't vote for him? It was a worry others wouldn't not that they wouldn't in the general. Vote blue would have included him as well and anyone holding their vote wouldve gotten similar attacks
Like who is saying they wouldnt vote for the candidate if its not Newsom
Like who is saying they wouldnt vote for the candidate if its not Newsom
Really? I see more people who hate anyone who is holding their support in the general election.
February 15, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Really? I see more people who hate anyone who is holding their support in the general election.
It's also a general election slogan not a primary one. Hash it out in the primary and then vote blue no matter who.
Republicans have become such a toxic party that yes Newsom transphobia is still better than JD's.
Understanding that reality isn't support for Newsom.
Republicans have become such a toxic party that yes Newsom transphobia is still better than JD's.
Understanding that reality isn't support for Newsom.
February 15, 2026 at 11:25 PM
It's also a general election slogan not a primary one. Hash it out in the primary and then vote blue no matter who.
Republicans have become such a toxic party that yes Newsom transphobia is still better than JD's.
Understanding that reality isn't support for Newsom.
Republicans have become such a toxic party that yes Newsom transphobia is still better than JD's.
Understanding that reality isn't support for Newsom.
Using a republican pretending to be a democrat isn't arguing in good faith.
February 15, 2026 at 10:52 PM
Using a republican pretending to be a democrat isn't arguing in good faith.
I think a good example of this is Lincoln. Obviously one of the greatest presidents but he was definitely a separate but equal guy and has speeches on it. Like no mixed marriages
He had racists views by todays politics despite you know ending slavery
Politics are more complicated than most realize
He had racists views by todays politics despite you know ending slavery
Politics are more complicated than most realize
February 7, 2026 at 11:35 PM
I think a good example of this is Lincoln. Obviously one of the greatest presidents but he was definitely a separate but equal guy and has speeches on it. Like no mixed marriages
He had racists views by todays politics despite you know ending slavery
Politics are more complicated than most realize
He had racists views by todays politics despite you know ending slavery
Politics are more complicated than most realize
Its better than what we have but just like the senate it still gives small states much more power. If you take the house distribution and applied it to this scenario California would get 120 judges and Wyoming 2
The electoral college is better at being representative than the senate. Its outdated
The electoral college is better at being representative than the senate. Its outdated
February 7, 2026 at 7:26 AM
Its better than what we have but just like the senate it still gives small states much more power. If you take the house distribution and applied it to this scenario California would get 120 judges and Wyoming 2
The electoral college is better at being representative than the senate. Its outdated
The electoral college is better at being representative than the senate. Its outdated
Eh there is a point there. The senate is the more undemocratic part of congress. There's a reason it's not in other representative democracies.
Not saying its a bad plan, and we definitely need reform, just that its a fair point.
Not saying its a bad plan, and we definitely need reform, just that its a fair point.
February 7, 2026 at 5:17 AM
Eh there is a point there. The senate is the more undemocratic part of congress. There's a reason it's not in other representative democracies.
Not saying its a bad plan, and we definitely need reform, just that its a fair point.
Not saying its a bad plan, and we definitely need reform, just that its a fair point.
I can't wait to share it with my daughter. She's 6 and a red head. So having a story about a kickass red head, that's writen by one and read it to her by one will be a good day.
February 4, 2026 at 11:55 PM
I can't wait to share it with my daughter. She's 6 and a red head. So having a story about a kickass red head, that's writen by one and read it to her by one will be a good day.
Doubtful not being on school grounds. Not that they couldn't try but it makes it harder.
February 3, 2026 at 7:01 PM
Doubtful not being on school grounds. Not that they couldn't try but it makes it harder.
I don't think that's true. It's not that there is worse stuff in there but more the amount of what is in there shows how close of a connection they had making it hard to hide.
February 2, 2026 at 5:46 PM
I don't think that's true. It's not that there is worse stuff in there but more the amount of what is in there shows how close of a connection they had making it hard to hide.
Now you are talking about random shit. No one was talking about "defund the police."
“There’s still no evidence of beheaded babies or raped women. But they still keep using that lie [for] propaganda.”
Was his direct quote. Which he took back as that was not infact the evidence.
“There’s still no evidence of beheaded babies or raped women. But they still keep using that lie [for] propaganda.”
Was his direct quote. Which he took back as that was not infact the evidence.
January 15, 2026 at 3:59 AM
Now you are talking about random shit. No one was talking about "defund the police."
“There’s still no evidence of beheaded babies or raped women. But they still keep using that lie [for] propaganda.”
Was his direct quote. Which he took back as that was not infact the evidence.
“There’s still no evidence of beheaded babies or raped women. But they still keep using that lie [for] propaganda.”
Was his direct quote. Which he took back as that was not infact the evidence.
I said the phrase doesn't apply to primaries and your examples are from primaries.
Na, once Bowman lied about the hamas attack he killed his own career.
Na, once Bowman lied about the hamas attack he killed his own career.
January 15, 2026 at 3:31 AM
I said the phrase doesn't apply to primaries and your examples are from primaries.
Na, once Bowman lied about the hamas attack he killed his own career.
Na, once Bowman lied about the hamas attack he killed his own career.
Why are you bringing up primaries when once again the slogan isn't for primaries. That is my whole point.
I loved Bowman when he first ran and won, was hoping he'd go far, but he has no one to blame but himself for his unforced political errors.
I loved Bowman when he first ran and won, was hoping he'd go far, but he has no one to blame but himself for his unforced political errors.
January 15, 2026 at 2:56 AM
Why are you bringing up primaries when once again the slogan isn't for primaries. That is my whole point.
I loved Bowman when he first ran and won, was hoping he'd go far, but he has no one to blame but himself for his unforced political errors.
I loved Bowman when he first ran and won, was hoping he'd go far, but he has no one to blame but himself for his unforced political errors.
Na this is a too online take for most people. Vote blue no matter who definitely means leftists ones as well in November.
To most people it means fight it out in the primary then vote blue as the other option isn't a viable one. People who abuse it are shits but it usually isn't used in primarys.
To most people it means fight it out in the primary then vote blue as the other option isn't a viable one. People who abuse it are shits but it usually isn't used in primarys.
January 15, 2026 at 1:15 AM
Na this is a too online take for most people. Vote blue no matter who definitely means leftists ones as well in November.
To most people it means fight it out in the primary then vote blue as the other option isn't a viable one. People who abuse it are shits but it usually isn't used in primarys.
To most people it means fight it out in the primary then vote blue as the other option isn't a viable one. People who abuse it are shits but it usually isn't used in primarys.
Eh thats a November slogan though. Primary these fools.
January 15, 2026 at 12:58 AM
Eh thats a November slogan though. Primary these fools.
It's striking enough that it becomes obvious he doesn't even understand the difference at a fundamental level.
January 7, 2026 at 10:33 PM
It's striking enough that it becomes obvious he doesn't even understand the difference at a fundamental level.