It doesnt properly account for the discounts that buyers are getting.

They can produce oil even at $0 :)

btw.: the $15 numbers in that article screenshot is the marginal cost - not the total cost, which excluding taxes is estimated to be around $30.

Ukrainian military has this year been posting a smaller share of footage of the losses they have inflicted, so there are many Russian losses which are documented but not published - and so missing from our loss list.

The reason isnt known to us

6 days (instead of 3 for the usual update)

Bumpy footage releases by both sides (but more has recently been posted by Russia)

btw.: here is a screenshot of part of the loss list, with a random entry being highlighted - each entry contains a link to the relevant image(s) of that loss

I was alwayys interested in military history and when I started watching the Syrian Civil War, I decided to firts archive the footage and later I started analyzing the content.

I have been analyzing heavy weapons losses from various conflicts for over a decade :)

the article has all the relevant losses with each entry having a link to its visual evidence.

I am sure that are capable of doing that :)

EU+ is producing way more arty ammo than the USA.

There are ways to mitigate that risk - especially if you are willing to spend extra $ (which would be the case for the US military).

DPRK production isnt very relevant - tha ammo they have been selling to Russia has been old (largely from the 1970s and 1980s)

That is a US Army problem (and not a very hard one)

Read my post: IMO buying from Ukraine would make a lot of sense.