Without an example, I can only guess at the requirement, but the best way to avoid different signatures is to use a flexible record type or sys.anydata. Or json. There is always a way to avoid duplicate code, and in many cases, dynamic execution can also be avoided or at least sufficiently secured.
September 26, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Without an example, I can only guess at the requirement, but the best way to avoid different signatures is to use a flexible record type or sys.anydata. Or json. There is always a way to avoid duplicate code, and in many cases, dynamic execution can also be avoided or at least sufficiently secured.
I know, and I'm fine with that for now. However, I had prepared myself for some new features, but those projects are now on hold. At least it would be nice to know if and when we can expect them. 19c won't be around forever, and I doubt all the features will be backported in the near future.
August 2, 2025 at 8:03 PM
I know, and I'm fine with that for now. However, I had prepared myself for some new features, but those projects are now on hold. At least it would be nice to know if and when we can expect them. 19c won't be around forever, and I doubt all the features will be backported in the near future.
I wish I could say the same. Unfortunately, the currently available options - cloud, free, and beta - are not an option for me, at least not at the moment.
August 2, 2025 at 7:40 PM
I wish I could say the same. Unfortunately, the currently available options - cloud, free, and beta - are not an option for me, at least not at the moment.