Rallicat
@rallicat.fun
🇬🇧🇪🇺🏳️🌈Manchester Fur, Single. Cheetah, Raccoon, Comms at ConFuzzled & Pawsome. He/Him.
Sex & Kink Positive Furry
🌐Links: https://solo.to/rallicat
📍Manchester, United Kingdom
📸Photos posted are strictly NOT to be reproduced without permission
Sex & Kink Positive Furry
🌐Links: https://solo.to/rallicat
📍Manchester, United Kingdom
📸Photos posted are strictly NOT to be reproduced without permission
'so, Jeremy, what do you think about the long term impacts of the GINI Coefficient being so high, and the degree to which this has driven an increase in poverty, and a contraction in the middle classes?'
'umm... Er... I DON'T LIKE YOUR TEETH!'
🤦
'umm... Er... I DON'T LIKE YOUR TEETH!'
🤦
November 30, 2025 at 5:30 PM
'so, Jeremy, what do you think about the long term impacts of the GINI Coefficient being so high, and the degree to which this has driven an increase in poverty, and a contraction in the middle classes?'
'umm... Er... I DON'T LIKE YOUR TEETH!'
🤦
'umm... Er... I DON'T LIKE YOUR TEETH!'
🤦
It's from their podcast and video channel.
Theres a YouTube option for their videos here: youtube.com/@boldpolitic...
Theres a YouTube option for their videos here: youtube.com/@boldpolitic...
YouTube
Bold Politics is a weekly podcast hosted by Zack Polanski, Leader of the Green Party. Each episode, Zack sits down at Acast Studios with thinkers, activists, and cultural figures to explore the progressive ideas shaping the UK’s future.
From migration, sustainability, and the economy to political messaging, equality, workers’ rights, and the challenges facing marginalised communities, Zack has honest, challenging conversations with people on the frontlines. He engages not only with those he respects but also with voices he sometimes disagrees with.
Bold Politics with Zack Polanski will also amplify stories that wouldn’t normally get a platform, answer questions from both supporters and critics, and challenge guests from across the political spectrum — all with his sights on building a fairer and more equitable UK that puts people and planet first.
"Nauseating left-wing populism" - The Times
Get in touch with the show: [email protected]
youtube.com
November 30, 2025 at 12:08 PM
It's from their podcast and video channel.
Theres a YouTube option for their videos here: youtube.com/@boldpolitic...
Theres a YouTube option for their videos here: youtube.com/@boldpolitic...
Ohhh hnffff yes that's hot! 😍❤️👀💦
November 26, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Ohhh hnffff yes that's hot! 😍❤️👀💦
Now go find all the Light-Roots! 🤣
November 26, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Now go find all the Light-Roots! 🤣
Oh absolutely.
Something is going right, just not for us!
Something is going right, just not for us!
November 26, 2025 at 8:33 AM
Oh absolutely.
Something is going right, just not for us!
Something is going right, just not for us!
That's so horrible. I'm so sorry, that's awful.
November 24, 2025 at 11:36 PM
That's so horrible. I'm so sorry, that's awful.
Oh god yeah. They're in a different world, and will have wealth managers who's job it is to maximise their wealth, and minimise the tax they pay.
That's part of why it's a challenge to do - they're /experts/ at avoiding tax. But we need to try, and we need to get it right.
That's part of why it's a challenge to do - they're /experts/ at avoiding tax. But we need to try, and we need to get it right.
November 24, 2025 at 11:17 AM
Oh god yeah. They're in a different world, and will have wealth managers who's job it is to maximise their wealth, and minimise the tax they pay.
That's part of why it's a challenge to do - they're /experts/ at avoiding tax. But we need to try, and we need to get it right.
That's part of why it's a challenge to do - they're /experts/ at avoiding tax. But we need to try, and we need to get it right.
Taxation based on asset ownership is where I'd start.
indeed wouldn't be easy, but the implication is that they *want* to do it, but are declaring it technically impossible.
But, that's not what they say. Instead they assert we should keep selling off the assets. It's failing. That's a fact.
indeed wouldn't be easy, but the implication is that they *want* to do it, but are declaring it technically impossible.
But, that's not what they say. Instead they assert we should keep selling off the assets. It's failing. That's a fact.
November 23, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Taxation based on asset ownership is where I'd start.
indeed wouldn't be easy, but the implication is that they *want* to do it, but are declaring it technically impossible.
But, that's not what they say. Instead they assert we should keep selling off the assets. It's failing. That's a fact.
indeed wouldn't be easy, but the implication is that they *want* to do it, but are declaring it technically impossible.
But, that's not what they say. Instead they assert we should keep selling off the assets. It's failing. That's a fact.
Across the country the question we should be constantly asking is 'who owns Britain?'.
The super rich buy land, property (commercial & residential), businesses (equities, shares), debt (commercial bonds, govt bonds, treasury gilts), and they even own our mortgages).
And they even get paid for it.
The super rich buy land, property (commercial & residential), businesses (equities, shares), debt (commercial bonds, govt bonds, treasury gilts), and they even own our mortgages).
And they even get paid for it.
November 23, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Across the country the question we should be constantly asking is 'who owns Britain?'.
The super rich buy land, property (commercial & residential), businesses (equities, shares), debt (commercial bonds, govt bonds, treasury gilts), and they even own our mortgages).
And they even get paid for it.
The super rich buy land, property (commercial & residential), businesses (equities, shares), debt (commercial bonds, govt bonds, treasury gilts), and they even own our mortgages).
And they even get paid for it.
They don't want to kill the golden goose, because they think it's actually benefitting ordinary people. 'investment brings jobs', we're told.
Problem is the focus is always on *quantity* of jobs. Never the quality. Never on how much they pay.
Problem is the focus is always on *quantity* of jobs. Never the quality. Never on how much they pay.
November 23, 2025 at 12:06 PM
They don't want to kill the golden goose, because they think it's actually benefitting ordinary people. 'investment brings jobs', we're told.
Problem is the focus is always on *quantity* of jobs. Never the quality. Never on how much they pay.
Problem is the focus is always on *quantity* of jobs. Never the quality. Never on how much they pay.
It's irrelevant anyway. The point is not geographic location. It's asset ownership.
We've been selling Britain to the super rich for four decades, and we can do that regardless of where in the world they live.
We've been selling Britain to the super rich for four decades, and we can do that regardless of where in the world they live.
November 23, 2025 at 11:55 AM
It's irrelevant anyway. The point is not geographic location. It's asset ownership.
We've been selling Britain to the super rich for four decades, and we can do that regardless of where in the world they live.
We've been selling Britain to the super rich for four decades, and we can do that regardless of where in the world they live.
No doubt it would need careful design. Nobody said it was easy.
But, we've done it before. Post war, we had a wealth tax.... And hey presto, we created Social Security, created the NHS, and kick started the largest expansion of the middle classes in the history of the country.
But, we've done it before. Post war, we had a wealth tax.... And hey presto, we created Social Security, created the NHS, and kick started the largest expansion of the middle classes in the history of the country.
November 23, 2025 at 11:52 AM
No doubt it would need careful design. Nobody said it was easy.
But, we've done it before. Post war, we had a wealth tax.... And hey presto, we created Social Security, created the NHS, and kick started the largest expansion of the middle classes in the history of the country.
But, we've done it before. Post war, we had a wealth tax.... And hey presto, we created Social Security, created the NHS, and kick started the largest expansion of the middle classes in the history of the country.
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death, and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!
November 20, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death, and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!
I say bring it on.
Someone has to offer a solid challenge to Neoliberalism. It sure isn't going to be Starmer.
Someone has to offer a solid challenge to Neoliberalism. It sure isn't going to be Starmer.
November 20, 2025 at 6:04 PM
I say bring it on.
Someone has to offer a solid challenge to Neoliberalism. It sure isn't going to be Starmer.
Someone has to offer a solid challenge to Neoliberalism. It sure isn't going to be Starmer.