@quackometer.bsky.social
The problem is that he did not know at the time there was nothing he could do.
November 25, 2025 at 10:01 PM
The problem is that he did not know at the time there was nothing he could do.
There is no such thing as a "cis woman" - that is ideological claptrap.
No woman will be "violated" by this female-only policy. You are not asking women to share their spaces with "trans folk" but with men. Some of those men may be wearing dresses. They are still men. They need to use male spaces.
No woman will be "violated" by this female-only policy. You are not asking women to share their spaces with "trans folk" but with men. Some of those men may be wearing dresses. They are still men. They need to use male spaces.
November 25, 2025 at 12:43 PM
There is no such thing as a "cis woman" - that is ideological claptrap.
No woman will be "violated" by this female-only policy. You are not asking women to share their spaces with "trans folk" but with men. Some of those men may be wearing dresses. They are still men. They need to use male spaces.
No woman will be "violated" by this female-only policy. You are not asking women to share their spaces with "trans folk" but with men. Some of those men may be wearing dresses. They are still men. They need to use male spaces.
That is entirely your suggestion. What measures do you actually propose?
November 21, 2025 at 5:15 PM
That is entirely your suggestion. What measures do you actually propose?
My daughter is a teenager and needs to use a showing area.
I am well used to attempts at deflection to these very simple questions. Please do not go down that road. Please answer clearly and unambiguously.
So far your answers are clownish.
I am well used to attempts at deflection to these very simple questions. Please do not go down that road. Please answer clearly and unambiguously.
So far your answers are clownish.
November 21, 2025 at 5:14 PM
My daughter is a teenager and needs to use a showing area.
I am well used to attempts at deflection to these very simple questions. Please do not go down that road. Please answer clearly and unambiguously.
So far your answers are clownish.
I am well used to attempts at deflection to these very simple questions. Please do not go down that road. Please answer clearly and unambiguously.
So far your answers are clownish.
So I am listening to you. I am interted in what you have to say on...
1) Should my daughter have the right to female only changing rooms at schools and sports facilities where no males are admitted?
2) If not, why should she not be allowed this provision?
3) How should we ensure no males enter?
1) Should my daughter have the right to female only changing rooms at schools and sports facilities where no males are admitted?
2) If not, why should she not be allowed this provision?
3) How should we ensure no males enter?
November 21, 2025 at 3:42 PM
So I am listening to you. I am interted in what you have to say on...
1) Should my daughter have the right to female only changing rooms at schools and sports facilities where no males are admitted?
2) If not, why should she not be allowed this provision?
3) How should we ensure no males enter?
1) Should my daughter have the right to female only changing rooms at schools and sports facilities where no males are admitted?
2) If not, why should she not be allowed this provision?
3) How should we ensure no males enter?
There is a strong incentive for activists to lie here.
The proposals for women only spaces are so modest and so obviously beneficial that rational argument against them is not possible.
Inventing problems is a good solution. Well done to them.
The proposals for women only spaces are so modest and so obviously beneficial that rational argument against them is not possible.
Inventing problems is a good solution. Well done to them.
November 21, 2025 at 2:34 PM
There is a strong incentive for activists to lie here.
The proposals for women only spaces are so modest and so obviously beneficial that rational argument against them is not possible.
Inventing problems is a good solution. Well done to them.
The proposals for women only spaces are so modest and so obviously beneficial that rational argument against them is not possible.
Inventing problems is a good solution. Well done to them.
No. Mostly men. Dressed as women.
November 21, 2025 at 2:08 PM
No. Mostly men. Dressed as women.
No one has been harmed. This is all activist deceit.
November 21, 2025 at 2:01 PM
No one has been harmed. This is all activist deceit.
So in your scheme to allow transwomen into women's spaces, what do you propose to stop the transvestites and autogynephiles from abusing your inclusion?
November 21, 2025 at 2:00 PM
So in your scheme to allow transwomen into women's spaces, what do you propose to stop the transvestites and autogynephiles from abusing your inclusion?
What? How am I protecting men ffs?
November 21, 2025 at 1:58 PM
What? How am I protecting men ffs?
I have not mentioned it is about transpeople. I have been consistently saying it is about males/men.
November 21, 2025 at 1:57 PM
I have not mentioned it is about transpeople. I have been consistently saying it is about males/men.
I am not smearing transpeople with any crimes. I am sure most are law abiding like everyone else.
But it is serious naivety to think men with transvestic paraphilias are not a threat to women. How do you know you are not dealing with a man with a cross dressing paraphilia - or an Autogynephile?
But it is serious naivety to think men with transvestic paraphilias are not a threat to women. How do you know you are not dealing with a man with a cross dressing paraphilia - or an Autogynephile?
November 21, 2025 at 1:55 PM
I am not smearing transpeople with any crimes. I am sure most are law abiding like everyone else.
But it is serious naivety to think men with transvestic paraphilias are not a threat to women. How do you know you are not dealing with a man with a cross dressing paraphilia - or an Autogynephile?
But it is serious naivety to think men with transvestic paraphilias are not a threat to women. How do you know you are not dealing with a man with a cross dressing paraphilia - or an Autogynephile?
You have no evidence this is a problem. There are a few isolated cases on social media - I suspect made up by activists.
No one is stopping butch women from using office loos. Everyone in the office knows she is a woman. Because they are not stupid.
No one is stopping butch women from using office loos. Everyone in the office knows she is a woman. Because they are not stupid.
November 21, 2025 at 1:54 PM
You have no evidence this is a problem. There are a few isolated cases on social media - I suspect made up by activists.
No one is stopping butch women from using office loos. Everyone in the office knows she is a woman. Because they are not stupid.
No one is stopping butch women from using office loos. Everyone in the office knows she is a woman. Because they are not stupid.
There is zero pressure on you to conform to any stereotype. No one is policing you. The problem is men. We all agree on that. No women's rights are being threatened. As with the For Women Scotland case, women's rights are being upheld and strengthened in the UK.
November 21, 2025 at 1:39 PM
There is zero pressure on you to conform to any stereotype. No one is policing you. The problem is men. We all agree on that. No women's rights are being threatened. As with the For Women Scotland case, women's rights are being upheld and strengthened in the UK.
What restrictions are being placed on women and transpeople exactly?
The restriction is being placed on men to stay out of women's spaces. My entire argument is about male violence and protecting women.
The restriction is being placed on men to stay out of women's spaces. My entire argument is about male violence and protecting women.
November 21, 2025 at 1:34 PM
What restrictions are being placed on women and transpeople exactly?
The restriction is being placed on men to stay out of women's spaces. My entire argument is about male violence and protecting women.
The restriction is being placed on men to stay out of women's spaces. My entire argument is about male violence and protecting women.
Indeed. Women prison officers should also not have to deal with dangerous men on their floors.
November 21, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Indeed. Women prison officers should also not have to deal with dangerous men on their floors.
That does not mean in *all* places - like *all* men should be excluded from female only spaces. That is not discrimination against trans people - they are treated exactly the same as everyone else with the same sex.
November 21, 2025 at 1:21 PM
That does not mean in *all* places - like *all* men should be excluded from female only spaces. That is not discrimination against trans people - they are treated exactly the same as everyone else with the same sex.
"lived gender" is a meaningless expression.
Such prisoners have a sex. They should be in the prison that corresponds to their sex. Anything else is a direct threat to women prisoners - and maybe the staff there too.
Women can of course interact with people who are trans- just like everyone else.
Such prisoners have a sex. They should be in the prison that corresponds to their sex. Anything else is a direct threat to women prisoners - and maybe the staff there too.
Women can of course interact with people who are trans- just like everyone else.
November 21, 2025 at 1:21 PM
"lived gender" is a meaningless expression.
Such prisoners have a sex. They should be in the prison that corresponds to their sex. Anything else is a direct threat to women prisoners - and maybe the staff there too.
Women can of course interact with people who are trans- just like everyone else.
Such prisoners have a sex. They should be in the prison that corresponds to their sex. Anything else is a direct threat to women prisoners - and maybe the staff there too.
Women can of course interact with people who are trans- just like everyone else.
So you cannot explain your leap of imagination. I thought so.
November 21, 2025 at 1:16 PM
So you cannot explain your leap of imagination. I thought so.
Cowards block. Well done for not being an intellectual coward.
November 21, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Cowards block. Well done for not being an intellectual coward.
I would add the word "potential" as most men are not so abusive.
But men are responsible for almost all sex-based crimes and their victims are almost always women and girls.
As such we women deserve male free environments now and again.
What is bigoted about that?
But men are responsible for almost all sex-based crimes and their victims are almost always women and girls.
As such we women deserve male free environments now and again.
What is bigoted about that?
November 21, 2025 at 1:13 PM
I would add the word "potential" as most men are not so abusive.
But men are responsible for almost all sex-based crimes and their victims are almost always women and girls.
As such we women deserve male free environments now and again.
What is bigoted about that?
But men are responsible for almost all sex-based crimes and their victims are almost always women and girls.
As such we women deserve male free environments now and again.
What is bigoted about that?