Adam Pulver
@pulvinator.bsky.social
Public interest attorney- admin law, workers rights, consumer rights, civil rights- personal account/views my own - he/him
Does a 23(f) go to a motions panel? I don't know what a "non-substantive order" is.
October 31, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Does a 23(f) go to a motions panel? I don't know what a "non-substantive order" is.
Yes, see e.g., storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
#33 in City of Evanston v. William P. Barr (N.D. Ill., 1:18-cv-04853) – CourtListener.com
CERTIFIED copy of order dated 8/29/2018 from the 7th Circuit regarding notice of appeal 24 ; Appellate case no. : 18-2734; IT IS ORDERED that the emergency motion to lift the stay of preliminary injun...
storage.courtlistener.com
October 31, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Yes, see e.g., storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
But skeeting that doesn't get you 100k followers!
October 23, 2025 at 4:13 PM
But skeeting that doesn't get you 100k followers!
But pundits on social media said it was amazing!
October 1, 2025 at 12:01 AM
But pundits on social media said it was amazing!
I don't think her aggressive style in argument is remotely comparable to getting up and ranting about the legitimacy of the Court and morality of other opinions.
September 28, 2025 at 7:57 PM
I don't think her aggressive style in argument is remotely comparable to getting up and ranting about the legitimacy of the Court and morality of other opinions.
No no, the Supreme Court justices are just one more sick burn from a law professor podcast or slate think piece from changing their minds
September 28, 2025 at 7:04 PM
No no, the Supreme Court justices are just one more sick burn from a law professor podcast or slate think piece from changing their minds
I have attended a Lisa Blatt argument, thanks.
September 28, 2025 at 7:03 PM
I have attended a Lisa Blatt argument, thanks.
At best, the client is ok with you converting an oral argument into an opportunity for you to make the case about you and your smug self satisfaction
September 28, 2025 at 6:54 PM
At best, the client is ok with you converting an oral argument into an opportunity for you to make the case about you and your smug self satisfaction
How would this benefit the client at all?
September 28, 2025 at 6:53 PM
How would this benefit the client at all?
Which isn't just a personal loss, but a loss for the causes you believe in in which you can actually effect change as a litigator
September 28, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Which isn't just a personal loss, but a loss for the causes you believe in in which you can actually effect change as a litigator